Cited by 177Influenza Virus Research StudiesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmune responses and vaccinations

Circulating CXCR5+PD-1+ Response Predicts Influenza Vaccine Antibody Responses in Young Adults but not Elderly Adults

Open access
Herati, Ramin Sedaghat, Reuter, Morgan A, Dolfi, Douglas V, Mansfield, Kathleen D, Aung, Htin, Badwan, Osama Z, Kurupati, Raj K, Kannan, Senthil +5 more·2014·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Although influenza vaccination is recommended for all adults annually, the incidence of vaccine failure, defined as weak or absent increase in neutralizing Ab titers, is increased in the elderly compared with young adults. The T follicular helper cell (Tfh) subset of CD4 T cells provides B cell help in germinal centers and is necessary for class-switched Ab responses. Previous studies suggested a role for circulating Tfh cells (cTfh) following influenza vaccination in adults, but cTfh have not been studied in elderly adults in whom weak vaccine responses are often observed. In this study, we studied cTfh expressing CXCR5 and programmed death-1 (PD-1). cTfh from elderly adults were present at reduced frequency, had decreased in vitro B cell help ability, and had greater expression of ICOS compared with young adults. At 7 d after inactivated influenza vaccination, cTfh correlated with influenza vaccine–specific IgM and IgG responses in young adults but not in elderly adults. In sum, we have identified aging-related changes in cTfh that correlated with reduced influenza vaccine responses. Future rational vaccine design efforts should incorporate Tfh measurement as an immune correlate of protection, particularly in the setting of aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1302503

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Timepoints were chosen a priori to capture the peak antigen-specific response for primary and secondary responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals.

    “Timepoints were chosen a priori to capture the peak antigen-specific response for primary (41) and secondary responses (42, 43) in SARS-CoV-2 naïve individuals.”
  • After vaccination, T follicular helper cells are less frequent in older subjects and appear to malfunction.

    “after vaccination, T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are less frequent in older subjects and appear to be malfunctioning”

    From Successful and Maladaptive T Cell Aging (2017) · cites this paper as Herati et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 177

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [39]WHO Global Influenza Surveillance Network Network S 2011 Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza WHO Press Geneva, Switzerland

Authors
Herati, R. S., Reuter, M. A., Dolfi, D. V., Mansfield, K. D., Aung, H., Badwan, O. Z., Kurupati, R. K., Kannan, S., Ertl, H., Schmader, K. E., Betts, M. R., Canaday, D. H., & Wherry, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
  • Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
  • Division of Infectious Disease, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH 44106
  • The Wistar Institute (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Wherry, E John
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
193
Issue
7
Pages
3528-3537
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1957514873
Cited by
177
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG028716, P30AG028716)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN266200500030C, AI080313, AI36219, T32AI007632, R01AI076066, R01AI080313, R01AI108972, P30AI036219, P30AI045008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
CXCR5, PD-1, influenza vaccination, vaccine antibody response, vaccine failure, aging, older adults, ICOS, B cell help, germinal center, class switch recombination, correlates of protection
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Formation, B-Lymphocytes, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Influenza Vaccines, Male, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Germinal Center, Receptors, CXCR5, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review