The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human immune response to multiple injections of murine monoclonal IgG.
Abstract
Murine monoclonal antibody infusions in humans should induce a human anti-mouse immunoglobulin (mIgG) immune response, especially if multiple infusions over an extended period of time are necessary for therapeutic efficacy. We have administered multiple infusions of the murine monoclonal antibody T101 to patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Five of 10 CTCL patients, compared with zero of six CLL patients, developed antibodies to mIgG. In those CTCL patients who did not demonstrate anti-mIgG antibodies, we were unable to correlate the lack of response to any of a large number of clinical parameters. Anti-mIgG antibodies were of both the mu and gamma isotypes and were detectable 14 days after the first infusion. Multiple infusions were associated with elevated titers. The anti-idiotypic portion of the anti-mIgG titer steadily increased with each infusion until eventually, in one patient receiving eight weekly infusions, well over one-half the serum anti-mIgG recognized only T101 and not four other murine IgG2AK antibodies tested. To increase our confidence in these findings, four separate assay systems were used to make these determinations. The identification of anti-idiotype antibodies as the dominant species of the immune response to multiple infusions of murine monoclonal antibody has major implications for future work with monoclonal antibodies. Although it has been suggested that human monoclonal antibodies would obviate an immune response, our work implies that such antibodies might still induce anti-idiotype antibodies if multiple infusions are administered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Replacing the complementarity-determining regions in a human antibody with those from a mouse
Jones, P. T., Dear, P. H., Foote, J., Neuberger, M. S., & Winter, G. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321522a0 · Cited by 1,406
Differential responses of human tumor cell lines to anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibodies
Lewis, G. D., Figari, I., Fendly, B., Lee Wong, W., Carter, P., Gorman, C., & Shepard, H. M. (1993) · Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy · doi:10.1007/bf01518520 · Cited by 498
Ligand-targeted liposomal anticancer drugs
Sapra, P., & Allen, T. M. (2003) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0163-7827(03)00032-8 · Cited by 438
Ribosome-inactivating proteins
Stirpe, F. (2004) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.05.004 · Cited by 388
Treatment of refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with radiolabeled MB-1 (anti-CD37) antibody.
Press, O. W., Eary, J. F., Badger, C. C., Martin, P. J., Appelbaum, F. R., Levy, R., Miller, R., Brown, S., Nelp, W. B., & Krohn, K. A. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1989.7.8.1027 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Shawler, D. L., Bartholomew, R. M., Smith, L. M., & Dillman, R. O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-08-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1530-1535
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1939186328
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human immune response to multiple injections of murine monoclonal IgG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.135.2.1530
- The paper
- Shawler, D. L., Bartholomew, R. M., Smith, L. M., & Dillman, R. O. (1985). Human immune response to multiple injections of murine monoclonal IgG. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.135.2.1530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.