The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative studies of human FcRIII-positive and negative natural killer cells.
Abstract
In the present study we have identified and characterized three subpopulations of peripheral blood NK cells based on the surface expression of CD56 and CD16. We have designated these subsets CD16neg, CD16dim, and CD16bright according to the relative surface density of CD16. The CD16bright subset comprised about 10% to 15% of PBL, whereas the CD16dim and CD16neg subsets comprise less than 1% of the total lymphocytes. A detailed characterization of these subsets revealed both similarities and differences. The three subsets shared a great deal of phenotypic similarity, expressing CD2, CD7, CD11b, CD38, CD45R, CD18, and the p75 IL-2R on the majority of the cells in each subset. There were, however, several prominent phenotypic differences, particularly in the expression of CD57, CD11c, CD44, CD25, Leu-8, L263, and L265. The CD16neg cells were morphologically large agranular lymphocytes and demonstrated low levels of non-MHC restricted cytolysis of NK-sensitive tumor lines. The CD16dim and CD16bright subsets were large granular lymphocytes and revealed potent cytotoxicity against NK-sensitive targets. All subsets demonstrated IL-2-dependent activation and proliferation; however, the CD16dim and CD16neg subsets were preferentially responsive to very low concentrations of rIL-2. Although rIL-4 effectively inhibited the IL-2-induced cytolytic activation of all three NK cell subsets, only the CD16bright cells showed rIL-4 inhibition of IL-2 dependent proliferation. Cytokine transcription was also differentially regulated in the NK cell subsets after rIL-2 activation. Although TNF-alpha was equally transcribed in each subsets, IFN-gamma and serine protease-HF were preferentially transcribed in the CD16bright NK cells. Based on these results, we propose that these NK cell subsets represent portions of the NK cell differentiation pathway present in the peripheral blood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets
Cooper, M. A., Fehniger, T. A., & Caligiuri, M. A. (2001) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02060-9 · Cited by 2,975
Human natural killer cells: a unique innate immunoregulatory role for the CD56bright subset
Cooper, M. A., Fehniger, T. A., Turner, S. C., Chen, K. S., Ghaheri, B. A., Ghayur, T., Carson, W. E., & Caligiuri, M. A. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v97.10.3146 · Cited by 1,449
Lopez-Vergès, S., Milush, J. M., Pandey, S., York, V. A., Arakawa-Hoyt, J., Pircher, H., Norris, P. J., Nixon, D. F., & Lanier, L. L. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-04-282301 · Cited by 752
Self-citationBjörkström, N. K., Riese, P., Heuts, F., Andersson, S., Fauriat, C., Ivarsson, M. A., Björklund, A. T., Flodström-Tullberg, M., Michaëlsson, J., Rottenberg, M. E., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-04-281675 · Cited by 734
A pan-cancer single-cell panorama of human natural killer cells
Tang, F., Li, J., Qi, L., Liu, D., Bo, Y., Qin, S., Miao, Y., Yu, K., Hou, W., Li, J., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.034 · Cited by 450
“In humans, NK cells can be subdivided into two major groups, CD56CD16 and CD56CD16, based on the expression levels of CD56 (NCAM1) and CD16 (FCGR3A).(9,10) The CD56CD16 NK cell population predominantly mediates the”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagler, A., Lanier, L. L., Cwirla, S., & Phillips, J. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3183-3191
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1504038693
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative studies of human FcRIII-positive and negative natural killer cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.143.10.3183
- The paper
- Nagler, A., Lanier, L. L., Cwirla, S., & Phillips, J. H. (1989). Comparative studies of human FcRIII-positive and negative natural killer cells. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.143.10.3183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.