Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cytokine enhancement of DNA immunization leads to effective treatment of established pulmonary metastases

Open access
Irvine, K R, Rao, J B, Rosenberg, S A, Restifo, N P·1996·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

DNA immunization can result in the induction of Ag-specific cellular and humoral immune responses and in protective immunity in several Ag systems. To evaluate the utility of DNA-based immunization as a potential cancer treatment strategy, we employed an experimental murine tumor, CT26, expressing the model tumor-associated Ag, β-galactosidase (β-gal), designated CT26.CL25. A plasmid expressing β-gal (pCMV/β-gal) administered by particle-mediated gene delivery to the epidermis using a hand-held, helium-driven "gene gun" induced β-gal-specific Ab and lytic responses. Immunization with this construct prevented the growth of pulmonary metastatic tumor, and the adoptive transfer of splenocytes generated by pCMV/β-gal in vivo immunization and cultured in vitro with the β-gal876-884 immunodominant peptide reduced the number of established pulmonary nodules. DNA immunization alone had little or no impact on the growth of established lung metastases. To enhance the function of DNA immunization for active immunotherapy, a panel of cytokines was added as adjuvants following DNA administration. Significant reduction in the number of established metastases was observed when human rIL-2, mouse rIL-6, human rIL-7, or mouse rIL-12 were given after DNA inoculation; mouse rIL-12 as an adjuvant had the most profound effect. These findings suggest that the cytokines involved in the activation and expansion of lymphocyte populations may improve the therapeutic effects of DNA immunization. Given the ease with which plasmid DNA can be prepared to high purity for safe use in humans with infectious diseases and cancers, DNA immunization administered together with cytokine adjuvant may be an attractive alternative to recombinant viral vaccines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.156.1.238

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Irvine, K. R., Rao, J. B., Rosenberg, S. A., & Restifo, N. P.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
238-245
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2137635909
Cited by
233
References
3
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytokine enhancement of DNA immunization leads to effective treatment of established pulmonary metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.156.1.238
The paper
Irvine, K. R., Rao, J. B., Rosenberg, S. A., & Restifo, N. P. (1996). Cytokine enhancement of DNA immunization leads to effective treatment of established pulmonary metastases. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.156.1.238

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.