Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Activation of NK cells by CC chemokines. Chemotaxis, Ca2+ mobilization, and enzyme release

Loetscher, P, Seitz, M, Clark-Lewis, I, Baggiolini, M, Moser, B·1996·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The responses of cloned human NK cells (ERNK57) to seven CC chemokines (monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), MCP-2, MCP-3, RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 α (MIP-1 α), MIP-1 β, and 1309) and two CXC chemokines (IL-8 and IP-10) were studied. Except for 1309, all CC chemokines induced chemotaxis of the NK cells in vitro, whereas the CXC chemokines were inactive. Maximal activity was obtained at 1 nM for MCP-1 and 10 to 100 nM for the other CC chemokines. The response showed a typically bimodal concentration dependence in all cases, except for RANTES, which induced a linear increase of migration over the concentration range of 0.1 to 1000 nM. A transient rise of the cytosolic-free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), which is characteristic for chemokine-stimulated leukocytes, was observed in NK cells after stimulation with all six active chemokines. Since granule exocytosis is required for NK cell-dependent target killing, the effect of CC chemokines on exocytosis was tested. All CC chemokines that induced chemotaxis and [Ca2+]i changes also induced the release of granzyme A and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase from cloned and blood NK cells, as well as CD8+ T cells after pretreatment with cytochalasin B. Maximum release was obtained from NK cells, and amounted to 35% and 13% of the total content of granzyme A and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, respectively. The capacity of cloned NK cells and CD8+ T cells to respond to chemokines depended on the time in culture after stimulation with PHA in the presence of irradiated feeder cells, and maximum responses were observed after 10 to 16 days. Our results demonstrate that CC chemokines activate NK cells, and are, therefore, not only attractants for monocytes, T lymphocytes, and eosinophil and basophil granulocytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.156.1.322

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Loetscher, P., Seitz, M., Clark-Lewis, I., Baggiolini, M., & Moser, B.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
322-327
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1610241671
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.