The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome
Abstract
Several lines of evidence indicate that immunologic effectors, particularly suppressor T cells and NK cells, may play a role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic repetitive abortions. To investigate the involvement of these immune cell populations, we determined the immunophenotypic characteristics of endometrial leukocytes from nonpregnant recurrent aborters. Habitual aborters with a negative investigation underwent an endometrial biopsy during their secretory phase and were followed prospectively to assess clinical outcome. Endometrial leukocytes were evaluated by two-color flow cytometric analysis. The percentage of endometrial CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly decreased in recurrent aborters, and their CD4:CD8 ratio was increased. In contrast, the proportion of B lymphocytes (CD20+) was strikingly increased in these patients’ endometria. The proportion of NK cells was identical in recurrent aborters and normal controls, but the CD16-CD56 bright NK cell subset, which is predominant in normal decidua and endometrium, was significantly decreased in favor of an important contingent of CD16+CD56 dim NK cells in all habitual aborters. Repetitive aborters who had normal CD8+ and CD20+ cell numbers and a normal CD4:CD8 ratio subsequently underwent successful pregnancies, while patients with continuing abortions presented lymphoid populations observed in the habitual aborters group. In conclusion, endometrial lymphocytes of recurrent spontaneous aborters harbor a distinct immunophenotypic profile that antedates implantation and suggests that endometrial immunologic conditions are intrinsically altered in recurrent aborters. Also, the prognostic impact of CD8 and CD20 expression supports their predominant role in the development of fetal tolerance. Finally, a role for NK cells in the abortion process is suggested by their altered subsets in all repetitive aborters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The preterm parturition syndrome
Romero, R., Espinoza, J., Kusanovic, J., Gotsch, F., Hassan, S., Erez, O., Chaiworapongsa, T., & Mazor, M. (2006) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x · Cited by 1,419
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227
Seshadri, S., & Sunkara, S. K. (2014) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt056 · Cited by 303
Pre-implantation endometrial leukocytes in women with recurrent miscarriage
Quenby, S., Bates, M., Doig, T., Brewster, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Johnson, P. M., & Vince, G. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.9.2386 · Cited by 301
Clifford, K., Flanagan, A. M., & Regan, L. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2727 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachapelle, M. H., Miron, P., Hemmings, R., & Roy, D. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4027-4034
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1546569067
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.156.10.4027
- The paper
- Lachapelle, M. H., Miron, P., Hemmings, R., & Roy, D. C. (1996). Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.156.10.4027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.