The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemokine expression by intraepithelial γ δ T cells. Implications for the recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged epithelia
Abstract
T cells expressing γ δ TCR may have evolved to recognize Ag in a different manner as well as perform a broader set of functions than T cells with α β TCR. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that dendritic epidermal T cells (DETC) bearing the invariant V γ 3V δ 1 TCR may be able to signal the migration of peripheral α β T cells to the epidermis by secreting specific chemokines. Expression of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 α, MIP-1 β, RANTES, and lymphotactin was inducible in DETC 7-17 cells, whereas mRNA for monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 could not be detected. Strikingly, lymphotactin was the most abundant chemokine produced by activated DETC 7-17 cells. Activated primary DETC cultures also produced copious amounts of lymphotactin mRNA. Similarly, freshly isolated and activated intestinal intraepithelial T cells (i-IEL) with γ δ TCR expressed high levels of lymphotactin mRNA. In contrast, lymphotactin mRNA was present in activated spleen γ δ T cells at low basal levels. Migration of CD8+ T cells induced by culture supernatants from stimulated DETC 7-17 cells was strongly reduced in the presence of a neutralizing anti-lymphotactin antiserum and to a lesser extent by neutralizing anti-MIP-1 α, anti-MIP-1 β, or anti-RANTES antiserum. The presence of lymphotactin in supernatants from activated DETC 7-17 cultures was directly demonstrated by Western blot analysis. These observations are consistent with a model in which γ δ IEL play an active multi-faceted role in the maintenance of epithelia homeostasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology
Vantourout, P., & Hayday, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3384 · Cited by 1,232
Bachelerie, F., Ben-Baruch, A., Burkhardt, A. M., Combadiere, C., Farber, J. M., Graham, G. J., Horuk, R., Sparre-Ulrich, A. H., Locati, M., Luster, A. D., et al. (2014) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.113.007724 · Cited by 850
γδ T cells: functional plasticity and heterogeneity
Carding, S. R., & Egan, P. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri797 · Cited by 814
Up-Regulation of Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-3α/CCL20 and CC Chemokine Receptor 6 in Psoriasis
Homey, B., Dieu-Nosjean, M.-C., Wiesenborn, A., Massacrier, C., Pin, J.-J., Oldham, E., Catron, D., Buchanan, M. E., Müller, A., deWaal Malefyt, R., et al. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6621 · Cited by 537
Intraepithelial lymphocytes: exploring the Third Way in immunology
Hayday, A., Theodoridis, E., Ramsburg, E., & Shires, J. (2001) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1101-997 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Boismenu, R., Feng, L., Xia, Y. Y., Chang, J. C., & Havran, W. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 985-992
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1560278958
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemokine expression by intraepithelial γ δ T cells. Implications for the recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged epithelia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.157.3.985
- The paper
- Boismenu, R., Feng, L., Xia, Y. Y., Chang, J. C., & Havran, W. L. (1996). Chemokine expression by intraepithelial γ δ T cells. Implications for the recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged epithelia. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.157.3.985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.