The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lipopolysaccharides from Distinct Pathogens Induce Different Classes of Immune Responses In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
The adaptive immune system has evolved distinct responses against different pathogens, but the mechanism(s) by which a particular response is initiated is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the type of Ag-specific CD4+ Th and CD8+ T cell responses elicited in vivo, in response to soluble OVA, coinjected with LPS from two different pathogens. We used Escherichia coli LPS, which signals through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and LPS from the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis, which does not appear to require TLR4 for signaling. Coinjections of E. coli LPS + OVA or P. gingivalis LPS + OVA induced similar clonal expansions of OVA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but strikingly different cytokine profiles. E. coli LPS induced a Th1-like response with abundant IFN-γ, but little or no IL-4, IL-13, and IL-5. In contrast, P. gingivalis LPS induced Th and T cell responses characterized by significant levels of IL-13, IL-5, and IL-10, but lower levels of IFN-γ. Consistent with these results, E. coli LPS induced IL-12(p70) in the CD8α+ dendritic cell (DC) subset, while P. gingivalis LPS did not. Both LPS, however, activated the two DC subsets to up-regulate costimulatory molecules and produce IL-6 and TNF-α. Interestingly, these LPS appeared to have differences in their ability to signal through TLR4; proliferation of splenocytes and cytokine secretion by splenocytes or DCs from TLR4-deficient C3H/HeJ mice were greatly impaired in response to E. coli LPS, but not P. gingivalis LPS. Therefore, LPS from different bacteria activate DC subsets to produce different cytokines, and induce distinct types of adaptive immunity in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA
Hemmi, H., Takeuchi, O., Kawai, T., Kaisho, T., Sato, S., Sanjo, H., Matsumoto, M., Hoshino, K., Wagner, H., Takeda, K., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35047123 · Cited by 6,491
Cited by
Takeda, K., Kaisho, T., & Akira, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 · Cited by 6,143
Collaborative Induction of Inflammatory Responses by Dectin-1 and Toll-like Receptor 2
Gantner, B. N., Simmons, R. M., Canavera, S. J., Akira, S., & Underhill, D. M. (2003) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20021787 · Cited by 1,643
Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization
Kapsenberg, M. L. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1246 · Cited by 1,437
Dendritic cells as therapeutic vaccines against cancer
Banchereau, J., & Palucka, A. K. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1592 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationMartin, M., Rehani, K., Jope, R. S., & Michalek, S. M. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1221 · Cited by 1,080
Metadata
- Authors
- Pulendran, B., Kumar, P., Cutler, C. W., Mohamadzadeh, M., Van Dyke, T., & Banchereau, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5067-5076
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1834719122
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipopolysaccharides from Distinct Pathogens Induce Different Classes of Immune Responses In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5067
- The paper
- Pulendran, B., Kumar, P., Cutler, C. W., Mohamadzadeh, M., Van Dyke, T., & Banchereau, J. (2001). Lipopolysaccharides from Distinct Pathogens Induce Different Classes of Immune Responses In Vivo. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.