Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cloning and Characterization of Chicken IL-10 and Its Role in the Immune Response to Eimeria maxima

Open access
Rothwell, Lisa, Young, John R, Zoorob, Rima, Whittaker, Catherine A, Hesketh, Pat, Archer, Andrew, Smith, Adrian L, Kaiser, Pete·2004·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

We isolated the full-length chicken IL-10 (chIL-10) cDNA from an expressed sequence tag library derived from RNA from cecal tonsils of Eimeria tenella-infected chickens. It encodes a 178-aa polypeptide, with a predicted 162-aa mature peptide. Chicken IL-10 has 45 and 42% aa identity with human and murine IL-10, respectively. The structures of the chIL-10 gene and its promoter were determined by direct sequencing of a bacterial artificial chromosome containing chIL-10. The chIL-10 gene structure is similar to (five exons, four introns), but more compact than, that of its mammalian orthologues. The promoter is more similar to that of Fugu IL-10 than human IL-10. Chicken IL-10 mRNA expression was identified mainly in the bursa of Fabricius and cecal tonsils, with low levels of expression also seen in thymus, liver, and lung. Expression was also detected in PHA-activated thymocytes and LPS-stimulated monocyte-derived macrophages, with high expression in an LPS-stimulated macrophage cell line. Recombinant chIL-10 was produced and bioactivity demonstrated through IL-10-induced inhibition of IFN-γ synthesis by mitogen-activated lymphocytes. We measured the expression of mRNA for chIL-10 and other signature cytokines in gut and spleen of resistant (line C.B12) and susceptible (line 15I) chickens during the course of an E. maxima infection. Susceptible chickens showed higher levels of chIL-10 mRNA expression in the spleen, both constitutively and after infection, and in the small intestine after infection than did resistant chickens. These data indicate a potential role for chIL-10 in changing the Th bias during infection with an intracellular protozoan, thereby contributing to susceptibility of line 15I chickens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2675

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Rothwell, L., Young, J. R., Zoorob, R., Whittaker, C. A., Hesketh, P., Archer, A., Smith, A. L., & Kaiser, P.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2004-08
Volume
173
Issue
4
Pages
2675-2682
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2118013478
Cited by
320
References
50
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning and Characterization of Chicken IL-10 and Its Role in the Immune Response to Eimeria maxima. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2675
The paper
Rothwell, L., Young, J. R., Zoorob, R., Whittaker, C. A., Hesketh, P., Archer, A., Smith, A. L., & Kaiser, P. (2004). Cloning and Characterization of Chicken IL-10 and Its Role in the Immune Response to Eimeria maxima. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.