Cited by 65T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Human CD4+ T Cells Are Predominantly Distributed among Six Phenotypically and Functionally Distinct Subsets

Open access
Amyes, Elisabeth, McMichael, Andrew J, Callan, Margaret F C·2005·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Human T cells are heterogeneous, varying in terms of their phenotype, functional capabilities, and history of Ag encounter. The derivation of a functionally relevant model for classifying CD4+ T cells has been hampered by limitations on the numbers of parameters that may be measured using classical four-color flow cytometry. In this study we have taken advantage of the introduction of reagents for five-color flow cytometry to develop a detailed, functionally meaningful scheme for classifying human CD4+ T cells. We show that CD4+ T cells are predominantly distributed among six of eight possible compartments, identified by the expression of CCR7, CD45RA, and CD28. We demonstrate novel phenotypic and functional correlates that justify the choice of these three molecules to define CD4+ T cell compartments. We note that CD4+ T cells with different Ag specificities are distributed differently among the six described subsets. On the basis of these results, we propose a cross-sectional model for classification of peripheral CD4+ T cells. Knowledge of where T cells lie on this model informs about their functional capacity and can reflect their history of Ag exposure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5765

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 65

Authors
Amyes, E., McMichael, A. J., & Callan, M. F. C.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Amyes, Elisabeth
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2005-11-01
Volume
175
Issue
9
Pages
5765-5773
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1669006040
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
CD4+ T cells, T cell subsets, T cell heterogeneity, CCR7, CD45RA, CD28, antigen specificity, cross-sectional models
MeSH terms
Humans, Interferon-gamma, Interleukin-2, Lymphocyte Activation, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Immunophenotyping, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Cytokines, Leukocyte Common Antigens, CD28 Antigens, Receptors, Chemokine, Receptors, CCR7

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review