Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Biological Activity of Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies Is Linked to Unique Epitopes on CD20

Open access
Teeling, Jessica L, Mackus, Wendy J M, Wiegman, Luus J J M, van den Brakel, Jeroen H N, Beers, Stephen A, French, Ruth R, van Meerten, Tom, Ebeling, Saskia, Vink, Tom, Slootstra, Jerry W, Parren, Paul W H I, Glennie, Martin J, van de Winkel, Jan G J·2006·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

We have previously defined a panel of fully human CD20 mAb. Most of these were unexpectedly efficient in their ability to recruit C1q to the surface of CD20-positive cells and mediate tumor lysis via activation of the classical pathway of complement. This complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) potency appeared to relate to the unusually slow off-rate of these human Abs. However, we now present epitope-mapping data, which indicates that all human mAb bind a novel region of CD20 that may influence CDC potency. Epitope mapping, using both mutagenesis studies and overlapping 15-mer peptides of the extracellular loops of CD20, defined the amino acids required for binding by an extensive panel of mouse and human mAb. Binding by rituximab and mouse CD20 mAb, had an absolute requirement for alanine and proline at positions 170 and 172, respectively, within the large extracellular loop of CD20. Surprisingly, however, all of the human CD20 mAb recognize a completely novel epitope located N-terminally of this motif, also including the small extracellular loop of CD20. Thus, although off-rate may influence biological activity of mAb, another critical factor for determining CDC potency by CD20 mAb appears to be the region of the target molecule they recognize. We conclude that recognition of the novel epitope cooperates with slow off-rate in determining the activity of CD20 Ab in activation of complement and induction of tumor cell lysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.362

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Teeling, J. L., Mackus, W. J. M., Wiegman, L. J. J. M., van den Brakel, J. H. N., Beers, S. A., French, R. R., van Meerten, T., Ebeling, S., Vink, T., Slootstra, J. W., Parren, P. W. H. I., Glennie, M. J., & van de Winkel, J. G. J.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
177
Issue
1
Pages
362-371
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2122725450
Cited by
609
References
1
FWCI
22.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Biological Activity of Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies Is Linked to Unique Epitopes on CD20. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.362
The paper
Teeling, J. L., Mackus, W. J. M., Wiegman, L. J. J. M., van den Brakel, J. H. N., Beers, S. A., French, R. R., van Meerten, T., Ebeling, S., Vink, T., Slootstra, J. W., Parren, P. W. H. I., Glennie, M. J., & van de Winkel, J. G. J. (2006). The Biological Activity of Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies Is Linked to Unique Epitopes on CD20. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.