Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrate Screen Identifies Rho Guanine Dissociation Inhibitor as a Substrate of Gene Related to Anergy in Lymphocytes

Su, Leon, Lineberry, Neil, Huh, Yul, Soares, Luis, Fathman, C Garrison·2006·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Ubiquitination of eukaryotic proteins regulates a broad range of cellular processes, including regulation of T cell activation and tolerance. We have previously demonstrated that gene related to anergy in lymphocytes (GRAIL), a ring finger ubiquitin E3 ligase, is required for the induction of T cell anergy; however, the substrate(s) for GRAIL E3 ligase activity is/are unknown. In this study, we report a novel prokaryotic system developed to screen for substrates of E3 ligases. Using this screen, Rho guanine dissociation inhibitor (RhoGDI) was identified as a potential substrate of GRAIL. GRAIL was subsequently demonstrated to bind and ubiquitinate RhoGDI, although GRAIL-mediated ubiquitination of RhoGDI did not result in proteosomal degradation. Expression of GRAIL in T cells resulted in specific inhibition of RhoA GTPase activation; activation of Rac1, cdc42, and Ras GTPases were not affected. Interestingly, stable T cell lines expressing dominant-negative RhoA mimicked the GRAIL-mediated IL-2 inhibition phenotype, and T cells expressing constitutively active RhoA were able to overcome GRAIL-mediated inhibition of IL-2 expression. These findings validate our prokaryotic screen as a method of identifying substrates for ubiquitin E3 ligases and suggest a role for Rho effector molecules in T cell anergy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.7559

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 2001, Mol. Cell, 499
  2. 2003, Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol., 141
  3. 2004, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 119
  4. 2001, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 503
  5. 2003, Immunity, 535
  6. 2004, J. Immunol., 79
  7. 1999, Cell. Signal., 545
  8. 2004, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 610
  9. 1998, Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol., 19
  10. 2000, Cell, 351
  11. 1998, Science, 509
  12. 2002, Nature, 629
  13. 1994, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 77
  14. 1996, Science, 1276
  15. 1996, J. Exp. Med., 2017
  16. 1996, Science, 1272
  17. 1998, J. Immunol., 5930
  18. 2004, Mol. Cell, 29
  19. 1999, Oncogene, 2117
  20. 1999, Oncogene, 4120
  21. 2003, J. Immunol., 96
  22. 1999, J. Immunol., 3819
  23. 2001, Nat. Immunol., 870
  24. 2004, Cell, 167
  25. 2004, J. Cell Sci., 1301
  26. 2002, Immunol. Rev., 98
  27. 1995, Cell, 1159
  28. 1998, Mol. Cell. Biol., 4986

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Su, L., Lineberry, N., Huh, Y., Soares, L., & Fathman, C. G.
Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2006-12-01
Volume
177
Issue
11
Pages
7559-7566
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
61
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review