Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of the misregulation of RhoA and RhoH in autoimmune mice. (HUM7P.302)

Antoni, Angelika, Ray, Chelsea, Kohn, Ryan, Andreyko, Diana, Levine, Jerrold·2014·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

When cultured in the presence of apoptotic cells, cell bodies or lipids, RhoA is misregulated in macrophages from all 6 autoimmune mouse strains but none of the 7 normal strains tested. Misregulation of RhoA results in defective morphology, altered cytokine production, and increased adhesion. The same macrophages cultured without apoptotic cell lipids had properly regulated RhoA and behaved normally. Normal mouse macrophages cultured with the Rho inhibitor C3 toxin, had defective macrophage morphology and behavior. Therefore, we proposed that autoimmunity is due to an apoptotic cell recognition signaling defect and that normal macrophage function may be restored by a chemical reversal of the defect. Our new data demonstrate that lupus strain, MRL, macrophages cultured in the presence of C3 no longer had defects in morphology and function. The fact that a RhoA inhibitor restored RhoA function indicates that the misregulation in autoimmune macrophages involves a RhoA regulator also affected by C3 and not RhoA itself. RhoH is a known inhibitor of RhoA and it is only expressed in hematopoietic cells. Experiments comparing RhoH expression in BALB and MRL macrophages suggest at least four different sizes of RhoH protein are expressed in normal macrophages in response to lipid exposure and that lupus macrophages do not express the multiple forms of RhoH even in the presence of lipids. A lack of proper RhoH expression could be behind the autoimmune macrophage defect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.192.supp.184.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Antoni, A., Ray, C., Kohn, R., Andreyko, D., & Levine, J.
Affiliations
  • Biology, Kutztown University , Kutztown, PA
  • University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, IL
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
192
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
184.11-184.11
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.