Cited by 84SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2: Let’s Stick to Known Knowns

Open access
Baumgarth, Nicole, Nikolich-Žugich, Janko, Lee, F Eun-Hyung, Bhattacharya, Deepta·2020·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The scale of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has thrust immunology into the public spotlight in unprecedented ways. In this article, which is part opinion piece and part review, we argue that the normal cadence by which we discuss science with our colleagues failed to properly convey likelihoods of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 to the public and the media. As a result, biologically implausible outcomes were given equal weight as the principles set by decades of viral immunology. Unsurprisingly, questionable results and alarmist news media articles have filled the void. We suggest an emphasis on setting expectations based on prior findings while avoiding the overused approach of assuming nothing. After reviewing Ab-mediated immunity after coronavirus and other acute viral infections, we posit that, with few exceptions, the development of protective humoral immunity of more than a year is the norm. Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is likely to follow the same pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.2000839

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protective immunity against symptomatic or severe secondary COVID-19 may involve memory compartments such as circulating memory T and B cells.

    “leaves open the reasonable possibility that protective immunity against symptomatic or severe 2° COVID-19 may very well involve memory compartments such as circulating memory T and B cells”

    From Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Baumgarth et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 100 · Cited by 84

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [21]Bao L, Deng W, Gao H, Xiao C, Liu J, Xue J, Lv Q, Liu J, Yu P, Xu Y, Qi F, Qu Y, Li F, Xiang Z, Yu H, Gong S, Liu M, Wang G, Wang S, Song Z, Zhao W, Han Y, Zhao L, Liu X, Wei Q, and Qin C 2020 Reinfection could not occur in SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques. bioRxiv 2020.03.13.990226.
  2. [24]Liu T, Wu S, Tao H, Zeng G, Zhou F, Guo F, and Wang X 2020 Prevalence of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan - implications for the ability to produce long-lasting protective antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. medRxiv 2020.06.13.20130252.
  3. [31]Woodruff M, Ramonell R, Cashman K, Nguyen D, Saini A, Haddad N, Ley A, Kyu S, Howell JC, Ozturk T, Lee S, Chen W, Estrada J, Morrison-Porter A, Derrico A, Anam F, Sharma M, Wu H, Le S, Jenks S, Tipton CM, Hu W, Lee FE-H, and Sanz I 2020 Dominant extrafollicular B cell responses in severe COVID-19 disease correlate with robust viral-specific antibody production but poor clinical outcomes. medRxiv 2020.04.29.20083717.
  4. [36]MacLennan IC, Toellner KM, Cunningham AF, Extrafollicular antibody responses. Immunol Rev. 2003; 194: 8– 18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2003.00058.x.. 12846803 · DOI
  5. [61]Iyer AS, Jones FK, Nodoushania A, Kelly M, Becker M, Slater D, Mills R, Teng E, Kamruzzaman M, Garcia-Beltran WF, Astudillo M, Yang D, Miller TE, Oiver E, Fischinger S, Atyeo C, Iafrate AJ, Calderwood SB, Lauer SA, Yu J, Li Z, Feldman J, Hauser BM, Cardonna TM, Branda JA, Turbett SE, LaRocque RC, Mellon G, Barouch DH, Schmidt AG, Azman AS, Alter G, Ryan ET, Harris JB, and Charles RC 2020 Dynamics and significance of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv 2020.07.18.20155374.
  6. [86]Ladner JT, Larsen BB, Bowers JR, Hepp CM, Bolyen E, Folkerts M, Sheridan K, Pfeiffer A, Yaglom H, Lemmer D, Sahl JW, Kaelin EA, Maqsood R, Bokulich NA, Quirk G, Watt TD, Komatsu K, Waddell V, Lim ES, Caporaso JG, Engelthaler DM, Worobey M, and Keim P 2020 Defining the Pandemic at the State Level: Sequence-Based Epidemiology of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by the Arizona COVID-19 Genomics Union (ACGU). medRxiv 2020.05.08.20095935.
  7. [89]Guo X, Guo Z, Duan C, Chen Z, Wang G, Lu Y, Li M, and Lu J 2020 Long-Term Persistence of IgG Antibodies in SARS-CoV Infected Healthcare Workers. medRxiv 2020.02.12.20021386.
  8. [91]Seow J, Graham C, Merrick B, Acors S, Steel KJA, Hemmings O, O’Bryne A, Kouphou N, Pickering S, Galao R, Betancor G, Wilson HD, Signell AW, Winstone H, Kerridge C, Temperton N, Snell L, Bisnauthsing K, Moore A, Green A, Martinez L, Stokes B, Honey J, Izquierdo-Barras A, Arbane G, Patel A, OConnell L, Hara GO, MacMahon E, Douthwaite S, Nebbia G, Batra R, Martinez-Nunez R, Edgeworth JD, Neil SJD, Malim MH, and Doores K 2020 Longitudinal evaluation and decline of antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection. medRxiv 2020.07.09.20148429.
  9. [102]Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart SP, Neuzil K, Raabe V, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Li P, Koury K, Kalina W, Cooper D, Fonter-Garfias C, Shi P-Y, Tuereci O, Tompkins KR, Walsh EE, Frenck R, Falsey AR, Dormitzer PR, Gruber WC, Sahin U, and Jansen KU 2020 Phase 1/2 Study to Describe the Safety and Immunogenicity of a COVID-19 RNA Vaccine Candidate (BNT162b1) in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age: Interim Report. medRxiv 2020.06.30.20142570.

Authors
Baumgarth, N., Nikolich-Žugich, J., Lee, F. E.-H., & Bhattacharya, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine–Tucson , Tucson, AZ 85724
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Baumgarth, Nicole
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
205
Issue
9
Pages
2342-2350
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W3082291484
Cited by
84
References
100
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 6
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health (R01AI099108, R01AI121252, R01AI117890, R37AG020719)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, antibody response, humoral immunity, viral immunology, acute viral infection, science communication, media coverage of COVID-19
MeSH terms
Seroconversion, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, B-Lymphocytes, Humans, Immunologic Memory, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Coronavirus Infections, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Immunity, Humoral, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review