Cited by 241Survey Methodology and NonresponseStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSurvey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

Attrition in Longitudinal Household Survey Data: Some Tests for Three Developing-Country Samples

Open access
Alderman, Harold, Behrman, Jere, Kohler, Hans-Peter, Maluccio, John A., Watkins, Susan·2001·Demographic Research

Abstract

Longitudinal household data can have considerable advantages over much more widely used cross-sectional data for capturing dynamic demographic relationships. Because the collection of longitudinal data may be difficult and expensive, analysts need to a

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4054/demres.2001.5.4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over time, the number of cases available for analysis in prospective longitudinal studies decreases, sometimes drastically.

    “Over time, the number of cases available for analysis decreases, sometimes drastically so (e.g., Behr et al. 2005, Alderman et al. 2001).”

    From Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable (2014) · cites this paper as Alderman et al. 2001

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Ahlo, Juha M., 1990, "Adjusting for Non-response Bias Using Logistic Regression," Biometrika 77(3): 617-624.
  2. Becketti, Sean, William Gould, Lee Lillard, and Finis Welch, 1988, "The Panel Study of Income Dynamics after Fourteen Years: An Evaluation," Journal of Labor Economics 6: 472-92.
  3. van den Berg, Gerard J. and Maarten Lindeboom, 1998, "Attrition in Panel Survey Data and the Estimation of Multi-State Labor Market Models," The Journal of Human Resources 33(2): 458-478.
  4. Cochran, William G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  5. Falaris, Evangelos M. and H. Elizabeth Peters, 1998, "Survey Attrition and Schooling Choices," The Journal of Human Resources 33 (2): 531-554.
  6. Fitzgerald, John, Peter Gottschalk, and Robert Moffitt, 1998, "An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data," The Journal of Human Resources 33 (2): 251-99.
  7. Foster, Andrew and Mark R. Rosenzweig, 1995, "Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture," Journal of Political Economy 103 (6): 1176-1209.
  8. Grosh, Margaret and Paul Glewwe, eds., 2000, Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries: Lessons from Ten Years of LSMS Experience, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press for the World Bank
  9. Lillard, Lee A. and Constantijn W.A. Panis, 1998, "Panel Attrition from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics," The Journal of Human Resources 33 (2): 437-57.
  10. Little, Roderick J. A. and Rubin, Donald B., 1987, Statistical Analyses with Missing Data, New York: Wiley.
  11. Maddala, G. S., 1983, Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Maluccio, John A., 2001, "Using Quality of Interview Information to Assess Nonrandom Attrition Bias in Developing Country Panel Data," Review of Development Economics (forthcoming).
  13. Powell, J., 1994, "Estimation of Semi-Parametric Models." In R. Engle and D. Mcfadden (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol IV, Amerstdam and New York: North Holland.
  14. Zabel, Jeffrey E., 1998, "An Analysis of Attrition in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the Survey of Income and Program Participation with an Application to a Model of Labor Market Behavior," The Journal of Human Resources 33 (2): 479-506.
  15. Ziliak, James P. and Thomas J. Kniesner, 1998, "The Importance of Sample Attrition in Life Cycle Labor Supply Estimation," The Journal of Human Resources 33 (2): 507-3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alderman, H., Behrman, J., Kohler, H.-P., Maluccio, J. A., & Watkins, S.
Affiliations
  • World Bank (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Venue
Demographic Research
Published
2001-11-13
Volume
5
Pages
79-124
ISSN
1435-9871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1504718459
Cited by
241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Demographic Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • FCND briefs (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Keywords
attrition, longitudinal household survey, panel data, survey data quality, demographic dynamics, data collection costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review