The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Community Question
Open accessAbstract
Wellman integrated and summarised previous arguments on social networks into the 'Community Question' : that community has been 'lost', 'saved', or 'liberated' in contemporary cities. This study assessed the pattern of social networks in Canberra from the three perspectives of the 'Community Question'. To gather empirical evidence, a sample survey of women in four study areas of Canberra was conducted in 1986-1987. Three hundred and ninety-two women who were under 55 years of age and who were married or in a de facto relationship were interviewed. Analysis of their network ties has revealed the following : (1) While primary ties in the neighbourhoods declined, people were compensated by their more extensive social networks, which ramified beyond their neighbourhoods and were dispersed in various places. In particular, kinship and friendship relationships flourished among them, and there was a tendency for people to be connected with others in more remote places. On balance, the 'community liberated' perspective is more consistent with the data than are either the 'lost' or the 'saved' perspectives.(2) This pattern of social networks is due to the fact that a large proportion of middle class people constitutes the city and that the Canberra population was characterised by a significant proportion of residents who were born outside the city, whether elsewhere in Australia or overseas.(3) In consideration of the above results, while residents in Canberra will diminish social ties with relatives and friends outside the city, they will develop kinship and friendship relationships in various locations within the city-relationships which are not constrained by geographical propinquity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies
Morley, D. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203398357 · Cited by 1,244
Computer Networks As Social Networks
Wellman, B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065547 · Cited by 918
Does Distance Matter in the Age of the Internet?
Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J. (2010) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098010377363 · Cited by 381
Socio‐economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment
Conley, T. G., & Topa, G. (2002) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.670 · Cited by 369
A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities
Wellman, B., Wong, R. Y.-L., Tindall, D., & Nazer, N. (1997) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/s0378-8733(96)00289-4 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Nobe, M.
- Venue
- Japanese Sociological Review
- Publisher
- The Japan Sociological Society
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-125,221
- ISSN
- 0021-5414 (ISSN-L)
- 1884-2755
- OpenAlex
- W2323361042
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Community Question. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4057/jsr.42.110
- The paper
- Nobe, M. (1991). The Community Question. Japanese Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.4057/jsr.42.110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.