Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Community Question

Open access
Nobe, Masao·1991·Japanese Sociological Review

Abstract

Wellman integrated and summarised previous arguments on social networks into the 'Community Question' : that community has been 'lost', 'saved', or 'liberated' in contemporary cities. This study assessed the pattern of social networks in Canberra from the three perspectives of the 'Community Question'. To gather empirical evidence, a sample survey of women in four study areas of Canberra was conducted in 1986-1987. Three hundred and ninety-two women who were under 55 years of age and who were married or in a de facto relationship were interviewed. Analysis of their network ties has revealed the following : (1) While primary ties in the neighbourhoods declined, people were compensated by their more extensive social networks, which ramified beyond their neighbourhoods and were dispersed in various places. In particular, kinship and friendship relationships flourished among them, and there was a tendency for people to be connected with others in more remote places. On balance, the 'community liberated' perspective is more consistent with the data than are either the 'lost' or the 'saved' perspectives.(2) This pattern of social networks is due to the fact that a large proportion of middle class people constitutes the city and that the Canberra population was characterised by a significant proportion of residents who were born outside the city, whether elsewhere in Australia or overseas.(3) In consideration of the above results, while residents in Canberra will diminish social ties with relatives and friends outside the city, they will develop kinship and friendship relationships in various locations within the city-relationships which are not constrained by geographical propinquity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4057/jsr.42.110

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Nobe, M.
Venue
Japanese Sociological Review
Published
1991
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
110-125,221
ISSN
  • 0021-5414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1884-2755
OpenAlex
W2323361042
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
24.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Community Question. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4057/jsr.42.110
The paper
Nobe, M. (1991). The Community Question. Japanese Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.4057/jsr.42.110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.