Cited by 169Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suffering from Loneliness Indicates Significant Mortality Risk of Older People

Open access

Abstract

Background. The harmful associates of suffering from loneliness are still in dispute. Objective. To examine the association of feelings of loneliness with all-cause mortality in a general aged population.Methods. A postal questionnaire was sent to randomly selected community-dwelling of elderly people (>74 years) from the Finnish National Population Register. The questionnaire included demographic characteristics, living conditions, functioning, health, and need for help. Suffering from loneliness was assessed with one question and participants were categorized as lonely or not lonely. Total mortality was retrieved from the National Population Information System.Results. Of 3687 respondents, 39% suffered from loneliness. Lonely people were more likely to be deceased during the 57-month follow-up (31%) than subjects not feeling lonely (23%, ). Excess mortality (, 95% ) of lonely people increased over time. After controlling for age and gender, the mortality risk of the lonely individuals was 1.33 (95% ) and after further controlling for subjective health 1.17 (). The excess mortality was consistent in all major subgroups.Conclusion. Suffering from loneliness is common and indicates significant mortality risk in old age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4061/2011/534781

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socially isolated individuals are less likely to receive emergency and routine medical care owing to their smaller social network.

    “Finally, in terms of social factors, socially isolated individuals are less likely to receive emergency and routine medical care owing to their smaller social network if they need help and have no means of transportation 90 .”

    From A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality (2023) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Introduction distinguishes social isolation from loneliness and mentions increased use of social and health services in studies of loneliness. Neither the Introduction nor the Discussion addresses whether socially isolated people receive less emergency or routine care because they lack contacts or transportation. Searches for those care-access and transportation claims found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1080/13607869856506 · DOI
  2. 1996, Ageing and Society, 16, 333, 10.1017/S0144686X00003457 · DOI
  3. 1990, Ageing Society, 10, 295, 10.1017/S0144686X00008308 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 1981, Journals of Gerontology, 36, 342, 10.1093/geronj/36.3.342 · DOI
  5. 1985, Journals of Gerontology, 40, 487, 10.1093/geronj/40.4.487 · DOI
  6. 1990, Gerontologist, 30, 377, 10.1093/geront/30.3.377 · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00993.x · DOI
  8. 2005, Aging—Clinical and Experimental Research, 17, 494, 10.1007/BF03327417 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/ageing/28.5.491 · DOI
  10. 2003, Aging—Clinical and Experimental Research, 15, 164, 10.1007/BF03324496 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.574 · DOI
  12. 1999, British Journal of General Practice, 49, 363
  13. 1999, Journal of Family Practice, 48, 801
  14. 2000, Lancet, 356, 77, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73414-0 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00767-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 1994, Journals of Gerontology, 49, S3, 10.1093/geronj/49.1.S3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 1994, Epidemiology, 5, 495
  18. 2004, Journals of Gerontology—Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59, 268, 10.1093/gerona/59.3.M268 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.004 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.013 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tilvis, R. S., Laitala, V., Routasalo, P. E., & Pitkälä, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • Central Union for the Welfare of the Aged, Malmin kauppatie 26, 00700 Helsinki, Finland
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Tilvis, Reijo S.
Venue
Journal of Aging Research
Published
2011
Volume
2011
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 2090-2204 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-2212
OpenAlex
W2027602209
Cited by
169
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Aging Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
loneliness, all-cause mortality, older adults, excess mortality, self-rated health, community-dwelling older adults, mortality risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review