Cited by 49Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Canine and human dirofilariosis in the rostov region (southern Russia)

Open access
Kartashev, Vladimir, Batashova, Irina, Kartashov, Sergey, Ermakov, Alexey, Mironova, Anna, Kuleshova, Yulia, Ilyasov, Boris, Kolodiy, Irina +8 more·2011·Veterinary Medicine International

Abstract

Epidemiological data on canine and human dirofilariosis in the Rostov Region (Southern Russia) are presented. Prevalence of Dirofilaria spp. infections in 795 autochthonous dogs, assessed by the Knott test, was 20.25%. The highest prevalence was found in Novocherkassk (38.3%) and Rostov-on-Don (18.5%), while prevalences were lower in other points of the region. Prevalence of D. repens was 44.7%, prevalence of D. immitis was 30.3%, and coinfections were observed in 25.0% of the dog population. A case finding study carried out during 9 years (2000-2009) revealed 131 cases of human dirofilariosis in the Rostov Region, 129 of subcutaneous dirofilariosis and 2 of pulmonary dirofilariosis. Seroprevalence among 317 healthy blood donors from the Rostov Region was 10.4%, while seroprevalence in policemen living in Rostov city and working in training dogs was 19%. These data show high infection rates of Dirofilaria spp. in both human and dog populations of Rostov, probably because of the existence of favorable conditions for the transmission in this region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4061/2011/685713

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Russia, a study reported a new endemic area, the Voronezh Natural Reserve, with prevalence ranging from 8.2 to 12.2%.

    “In Russia, there is a study reporting a new endemic area, the Voronezh Natural Reserve, with prevalence ranging from 8.2 to 12.2% [58], which adds to the known endemic area of Rostov-na-Donu [59].”
  • Seroepidemiological studies of residents of areas of endemicity reported higher rates of infection in a similar manner to those of canines of the same areas.

    “Seroepidemiological studies of residents of areas of endemicity reported higher rates of infection in a similar manner to those of canines of the same areas (1, 5, 13, 16, 17, 34).”
  • In the area surrounding Rostov-on-Don in southern Russia, in 2011, 20.25% of dogs were infected with Dirofilaria spp., 44.7% of which were infected with D. repens, 30.3% with D. immitis, and 25% were coinfected with both species.

    “In 1997, a prevalence of 30% was reported for D. repens (14), whereas in 2011, 20.25% of dogs were infected with Dirofilaria spp., 44.7% of which were infected with D. repens, 30.3% of which were infected with D. immitis, and 25% of which were coinfected with both species (197).”
  • In the Rostov region, between 2002 and 2009, 6.1% of studied dogs presented D. immitis, 5% of them co-infected by D. repens and microfilaremic; the region is currently considered endemic.

    “in the region of Rostov (south of Russia), between 2002 and 2009, 6.1% of the studied dogs presented D. immitis, 5% of them co-infected by D. repens and microfilaremic (Kartashev et al., 2011); currently, the region of Rostov is considered an endemic area.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 49

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Artamonova A Nagorny S Strelnikova G Levchenko L Human and canine dirofilariosis in Rostov region In: Proceedings of the 7th USSR Congress of the Society of Epidemiologists, Microbiologists, Parasitologists, vol. 1 1997 Moscow, Russia 326 327
  2. [7]Levchenko N Ermakov A Derezina T Nagorny S Epizootology, diagnosis and treatment of dirofilariosis in dogs In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Veterinary Medicine 1999 Moscow, Russia 148 150

Authors
Kartashev, V., Batashova, I., Kartashov, S., Ermakov, A., Mironova, A., Kuleshova, Y., Ilyasov, B., Kolodiy, I., Klyuchnikov, A., Ryabikina, E., Babicheva, M., Levchenko, Y., Pavlova, R., Pantchev, N., Morchón, R., & Simón, F.
Affiliations
  • Rostov State Medical University (RU)
  • North Caucasian Zonal Scientific Research Veterinary Institute (RU)
  • Rostov Regional Diagnostic Center, Ul. Pushkinskaya 127, 344000 Rostov-na-Donu, Russia
  • Rostov State Medical University, Per. Nakhichevansky 29, 344022 Rostov-na-Donu, Russia
  • IDEXX Laboratories (Germany) (DE)
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Corresponding author
Simón, Fernando
Venue
Veterinary Medicine International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011
Volume
2011
Pages
1-5
ISSN
2042-0048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031530618
Cited by
49
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Medicine International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria repens, Dirofilaria immitis, seroprevalence, co-infection, Rostov region, zoonotic transmission, blood donors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review