Cited by 194Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Clinical Features and Follow-up Study

Sandroni, Paola, Opfer-Gehrking, Tonette L., McPhee, Benjamin R., Low, Phillip A.·1999·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To define the clinical features and outcome of postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Materials and methods In this cross-sectional study of the autonomic symptom profile, inclusion criteria were orthostatic heart rate increment of 30 beats/min or greater, orthostatic symptoms, completion of a standardized autonomic test battery, and follow-up of 18 months or longer. We used 2 instruments. The first part was a structured and validated autonomic symptom profile (108 patients). The second part was a structured questionnaire focused on autonomic status on prospective follow-up (40 patients) (mean +/- SD follow-up, 67+/-52 months). Results Most patients had frequent, persistent, and at least moderately severe symptoms for less than 5 years. The following orthostatic symptoms occurred in more than 75% of subjects: light-headedness or dizziness, lower extremity or diffuse weakness, disequilibrium, tachycardia, and shakiness. Nonorthostatic symptoms included dry eyes or mouth, gastrointestinal complaints of bloating, early satiety, nausea, pain, and alternating diarrhea and constipation. Half of the patients reported an antecedent illness presumed to be of viral origin. On follow-up, 80 % of patients were improved, 60% were functionally normal, and 90% were able to return to work. Patients who had an antecedent event appeared to do better than those with spontaneous POTS. Salt supplementation and beta-blockers were the most efficacious therapies. Conclusion In the majority…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4065/74.11.1106

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 194

Authors
Sandroni, P., Opfer-Gehrking, T. L., McPhee, B. R., & Low, P. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Low, Phillip A.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
74
Issue
11
Pages
1106-1110
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156843990
Cited by
194
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1p01ns032352-01a1)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS 32352)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, orthostatic intolerance, autonomic dysfunction, follow-up outcomes, salt supplementation, beta-blockers, return to work, dizziness
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Male, Posture, Prospective Studies, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review