Cited by 71Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Primer on Medical Genomics Part XIV: Introduction to Systems Biology—A New Approach to Understanding Disease and Treatment

Open access
Morel, Nicole M., Holland, Joanne M., van der Greef, Jan, Marple, Edward W., Clish, Clary, Loscalzo, Joseph, Naylor, Stephen·2004·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

The advent of the "-omics revolution" has forced us to reevaluate our ability to acquire, measure, and handle large data sets. Omic platforms such as expression arrays and mass spectrometry, with their exquisite selectivity, sensitivity, and specificity, are unrivaled technologies for detection, quantitation, and identification of DNA, messenger RNA, proteins, and metabolites derived from complex body tissue and fluids. More recently, attempts have been made to capture the utility of these platform technologies and combine them under the umbrella of systems biology, also referred to as pathway, network, or integrative biology. Applied systems biology is the integrated analysis of genetic, genomic, protein, metabolite, cellular, and pathway events that are in flux and interdependent. It necessitates the use of a variety of analytic platforms as well as biostatistics, bioinformatics, data integration, computational biology, modeling, and knowledge assembly protocols. Such sophisticated analyses may provide new insight into the understanding of disease processes and mechanisms of action of pharmaceutical agents. Ultimately, this requires a perspective on how complex systems behave and are modulated. In this regard, systems biology, more appropriately considered as a process containing a series of modules, aims to provide tools and capabilities to carry out such tasks. We describe the essentials required to carry out systems biology experiments, the method in which integrated data in the form of a systems biology correlation network affords new insight into understanding disease, and the vista of developing more efficient biomarkers and therapeutic agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4065/79.5.651

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Haberman A. Potential of systems biology and pathways studies. G enet Eng New s. 2002;22:26-32.
  2. Abbott A. And now for tbe protcome. Nature.200l;409:747.
  3. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, et al. Integ¡ated geaomic and proteomic analysos of a systematically pertubed melabolic net- work. Science. 2001 ;292:929 -934.
  4. KifanoH. Foundatìorc of Systems Biolog, Carnbidge, Mass: MIT Press; 200 I .
  5. Chakabarti R, Rajagopalan R Diabetes and insulin ræistance associ¿ted disorde¡s: disease and the therapy. Cun Scì.2N2;83: 1533-1538.
  6. Clish CB, Davidov E, Ore.sic M, et al. Integra.tive biological analy- sis of the APOE*3-Loiden transgenic mouse. OMICS.20M;8:3-13.
  7. Butte AJ, Tamayo P, Slonim D, Golub TR, Kohane IS. Discovering fi¡¡ctional relationships between RNA expression and chemothera- peutic suscçtibility using relevance netwo¡ks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97 : l2lE2-12186.
  8. Naylor S. Biomarke¡s: current perspectives and ft¡ture prospects lúilonalf. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2003;3:525-529. 9 10. ll. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17, 18. r9. 20 'r1

Authors
Morel, N. M., Holland, J. M., van der Greef, J., Marple, E. W., Clish, C., Loscalzo, J., & Naylor, S.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Naylor, Stephen
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
651-658
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092797897
Cited by
71
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
systems biology, multi-omics integration, correlation networks, disease mechanisms, drug mechanisms of action, biomarker discovery, drug target identification, bioinformatics, computational modeling, mass spectrometry, gene expression profiling
MeSH terms
Animals, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Molecular Biology, Systems Theory, Genomics, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review