Association of Optimism-Pessimism With Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck and Thyroid Cancers
Abstract
Objective To examine the relationship between optimism-pessimism and quality of life (QOL) in survivors of head and neck and thyroid cancers.Patients and methods Between 1963 and 2000, 190 patients completed both the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), used to assess explanatory style (optimism-pessimism), and either the 12-Item or 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12 or SF-36), used to assess QOL. The MMPIs were completed an average of 13.4 years before the QOL assessment. The QOL measures were completed an average of 12.5 years after cancer diagnosis. Patients were divided into quartiles based on their MMPI Optimism-Pessimism scale score. Analysis was performed for all patients, those with head and neck cancer, and those with thyroid cancer. Adjustments were made for age, sex, and disease stage.Results For all 190 patients, optimism was associated with a higher QOL on both the mental and the physical component scales and 6 of 8 subscales of the SF-12 and SF-36. For patients with head and neck cancer, optimism was associated with higher QOL on 3 subscales but neither component scale. For patients with thyroid cancer, optimism was associated with higher QOL on both component scales and 6 subscales. After adjusting for age, sex, and disease stage, optimism was not associated with QOL in the head and neck cancer group.Conclusions Optimism was associated with a higher QOL in survivors of thyroid cancer compared with survivors of head and neck cancer. After adjusting for age, sex, and disease stage, optimism was not associated with QOL for survivors of head and neck cancer. Optimism was more associated with the mental rather than physical QOL subscales.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The self-report questionnaire we employed to assess QoL in our study (i.e., SF-12) was not specific for patients with HNC.
“Finally, the self-report questionnaire we employed to assess QoL in our study (i.e., SF-12) was not specific for patients with HNC, despite it having been used in several studies investigating QoL in this population (i.e., [74–76]).”
From Psychological variables associated with quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: the role of body image distress (2022) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Kung, S., Rummans, T. A., Colligan, R. C., Clark, M. M., Sloan, J. A., Novotny, P. J., & Huntington, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Intermountain Healthcare (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kung, Simon
- Venue
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1545-1552
- ISSN
- 0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992224109
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- optimism, pessimism, quality of life, head and neck cancer, thyroid cancer, cancer survivors, attributional style, MMPI, SF-12, SF-36, mental health, physical health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, MMPI, Quality of Life, Temperament, Thyroid Neoplasms, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review