Cited by 17Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Diabetes gestacional: implementación de una guía para su detección en la atención primaria de salud

Open access
Tuesca Molina, Rafael, Acosta Vergara, Tania, Domínguez Lozano, Brayan, Ricaurte, Carlos, Mendoza Charris, Humberto, Flórez-Lozano, Karen, Florez-García, Víctor·2019·Revista médica de Chile

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes (GD) impacts maternal and fetal morbidity. In 2012, the World Diabetes Foundation provided financing project in Barranquilla (Colombia), aimed to implement a clinical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. AIM: To estimate the adherence of the guide in primary care centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Cross-sectional study of pregnant women suspected of having gestational diabetes. Pregnant women were classified according to the week of admission to the prenatal control program: < week 24 or later. Women with a fasting blood glucose over 92 mg/dL and under 126 mg/dL or with some positive result to the oral glucose tolerance test were included. RESULTS: Nine percent (1,887 women) of 21,699 registries of pregnant women, were at risk for gestational diabetes. Of these, 1,880 registries with complete data were analyzed. Sixty nine entered the program at less than 24 weeks of pregnancy and 71% had had a fasting blood glucose measured in the first control. In 69.2% of these women, criteria for gestational diabetes was met. A glucose tolerance test was suggested to women with a blood glucose below 92 mg/dl. Among 72% of the latter, the glucose tolerance test met the criteria for gestational diabetes. Among the 498 women who entered the program after 24 weeks of gestation, 68% met the criteria for gestational diabetes with the fasting blood glucose levels. In 90 women, a glucose tolerance test was performed and 80% met the criteria for gestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate adherence to guidelines favors the detection of pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0034-98872019000200190

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuesca Molina, R., Acosta Vergara, T., Domínguez Lozano, B., Ricaurte, C., Mendoza Charris, H., Flórez-Lozano, K., & Florez-García, V.
Venue
Revista médica de Chile
Published
2019-02
Volume
147
Issue
2
Pages
190-198
ISSN
0034-9887 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943098068
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Revista médica de Chile (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes screening, clinical guideline adherence, primary care, oral glucose tolerance test, fasting blood glucose, prenatal care, Barranquilla
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Colombia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Primary Health Care, Diabetes, Gestational, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review