The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pensar la complejidad, pensar como síntesis
Abstract
After a number of general considerations, without meaning in any sense a reductionist approach, this paper argues in favour of the mathematics of discrete systems and of the non-classical logics, and claims that a complex thinking both entails and crosses through those domains.Such a proposal, it is argued, has not been a general concern until to-date among the communities of complexologists.At the end, several consequences are withdrawn at understanding what truly thinking about complexity is all about.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“La complejidad alude a la realidad múltiple, imbricada, a la crisis, a las singularidades, azares y aleatoriedades y otros fenómenos que no son percibidos o sentidos desde la perspectiva de la ciencia normal.”
From Convergencias entre el pensamiento complejo y la transcomplejidad (2019) · cites this paper as Maldonado, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/pric91844 · Cited by 4,264
Metaheuristics from design to implementation
Talbi, E. (2009) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 2,497
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Biological hypercomputation: A new research problem in complexity theory
Maldonado, C. E., & Gómez-Cruz, N. A. (2014) · Complexity · doi:10.1002/cplx.21535 · Cited by 29
Self-citationThe Mathematics of Logic: A Guide to Completeness Theorems and their Applications
Kaye, R. W. (2007) · Cited by 22
Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?
Weingartner, P. A. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05679-0 · Cited by 17
Coming to our senses: perceiving complexity to avoid catastrophes
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.52-1130 · Cited by 9
REFLEXIÓN SOBRE LAS IMPLICACIONES POLÍTICAS DE LA COMPLEJIDAD
Maldonado, C. E. (2014) · Alpha (Osorno) · doi:10.4067/s0718-22012014000100013 · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic
(2001) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9780631206934.2001.00003.x · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Beal, J. C. y Restall, G. 2006. Logical pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Maldonado, C. E. 2014b. ¿Qué es un sistema complejo? Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia 14(29): 71-93.
- Solé, R. 2011. Phase transitions. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cited by
Convergencias entre el pensamiento complejo y la transcomplejidad
Arce Rojas, R. (2019) · Praxis Pedagógica · doi:10.26620/uniminuto.praxis.19.24.2019.60-74 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Maldonado, C. E.
- Venue
- Cinta de moebio
- Published
- 2015-12
- Issue
- 54
- Pages
- 313-324
- ISSN
- 0717-554X
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
