Comunidad, organización y complejidad social andinas en el norte de Chile
Open accessAbstract
ResumenSe revisa la situación de las organizaciones aymara y atacameñas en las regiones andinas de Chile, enfatizando el papel crucial de las agencias estatales en la formación y funcionamiento de dichas organizaciones, especialmente debido a su necesidad de contar con interlocutores organizados.Se discuten los conflictos y tensiones dentro de la comunidad indígena, la más nueva y dominante figura organizativa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the 1990s, Chilean governments provided favorable political opportunities for Atacama communities to become actors in formulating their collective demands and defending land, water, and other resources.
“In the 1990s, when democracy returned to Chile, governments provided favorable political opportunities for Atacama communities to become actors in the formulation of their collective demands and the defense of land, water, and other resources (for an overview of indigenous organization and the processes of shaping ethnic demands see Gundermann and Göbel 2018; Gundermann and Vergara 2009”
From Mining companies, indigenous communities, and the state: the political ecology of lithium in Chile (Salar de Atacama) and Argentina (Salar de Olaroz-Cauchari) (2022) · cites this paper as Gundermann and Vergara 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dorn, F. M., Gundermann, H., & Gundermann, H. (2022) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.5014 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“In the 1990s, when democracy returned to Chile, governments provided favorable political opportunities for Atacama communities to become actors in the formulation of their collective demands and the defense of land, water, and other resources (for an overview of indigenous organization and the processes of shaping eth…”
Self-citationRomero-Toledo, H. (2019) · Colombia Internacional · doi:10.7440/colombiaint98.2019.01 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gundermann, H., & Vergara, J. I.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Católica del Norte (CL)
- Universidad de Antofagasta (CL)
- ORCID
- Vergara, Jorge Iván
- Venue
- Estudios atacameños
- Published
- 2009
- Issue
- 38
- ISSN
- 0716-0925 (ISSN-L)
- 0718-1043
- OpenAlex
- W1966794071
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y antropología surandinas (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- Andean indigenous communities, state government agencies, indigenous community organization, social complexity, interlocutor, indigenous conflict, northern Chile, Andean region
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
