CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SOBRE LA CRONOLOGÍA DE LA IMPOSICIÓN CUZQUEÑA EN CHILE

Cornejo, Luis·2014·Estudios atacameños
DOI 10.4067/s0718-10432014000100007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-10432014000100007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statistical treatments of calibrated dates have shown that Inca expansion both north and south of Cuzco was earlier than Cabello Balboa's dates.

    “In recent years, statistical treatments of calibrated dates have shown that Inca expansion both north and south of Cuzco was earlier than Cabello Balboa's dates (Michczyński and Pazdur 2003;Ogburn 2012;Cornejo 2014).”

    From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Cornejo 2014

    Cornejo’s analysis places the tentative start of Inca rule in Chile’s Norte Semiárido around 1370 CE, earlier than the conventional 1470 CE date discussed in ‘Antecedentes, datos y método’ (pages unavailable). But the paper studies Chile, south of Cuzco; these passages do not establish earlier expansion north of Cuzco or identify the comparison date as Cabello Balboa’s. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The growing body of calibrated 14C and TL dates suggests that Cabello Balboa's chronology underestimates the date of Inca expansions out of Cuzco, especially to the south.

    “The growing body of calibrated 14 C and TL dates hints that Cabello Balboa's chronology underestimates the date of Inca expansions out of Cuzco, especially to the south (e.g.Pärssinen and Siiriäinen 1997;D'Altroy et al. 2007;Cornejo 2014), but Bayesian models have not been used to test this.”

    From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Cornejo 2014

    The Methods and Results sections report calibrated radiocarbon and thermoluminescence dates and conclude that the conventional 1470 CE date is too late for Inca incorporation of parts of Chile. The paper attributes that conventional date to Rowe, not explicitly to Cabello Balboa, and its analysis concerns Chile rather than Inca expansions out of Cuzco generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • This range is similar to estimates for northern and central Chile.

    “This range is similar to estimates for northern and central Chile (Schiappacasse 1999;Cornejo 2014).”

    From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as Cornejo 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. BAUER, B. y A. COVEY, 2002. Processes of State formation in the Inca heartland (Cuzco, Peru). American Anthropologist 104 (3): 846-864.
  2. BERENGUER, J. e I. CÁCERES, 2008. Los inkas en el altiplano sur de Tarapacá: El Tojo revisitado. Chungara, Revista de Antropo- logía Chilena 40 (2): 121-143.
  3. CÁCERES, I., E. ASPILLAGA, A. DEZA y A. ROMÁN, 1993. Un sitio agroalfarero tardío en la cuenca del río Cachapoal. Actas del XII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología, vol. 1, pp. 423-428. Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, DIBAM, Temuco.
  4. CASTILLO, G., 1997 Los períodos Intermedio Tardío y Tardío: Desde la Cultura Copiapó al dominio inca. En Culturas prehis- tóricas de Copiapó, H. Niemeyer y M. Cervellino (Eds.), pp. 163- 282. Museo Regional de Atacama, Copiapó.
  5. CORNEJO, L., 1995. El Inka en la región del río Loa: Lo local y lo foráneo. Hombre y Desierto 9 (1): 203-213. __ 1999. Los incas y la construcción del espacio en Turi. Estudios Atacameños 18: 165-176.
  6. 2001a. Los inka y sus aliados diaguita en el extremo austral del Tawantinsuyo. En Tras la huella del Inka en Chile, C. Aldunate y L. Cornejo (Eds.), pp. 74-103. Museo Chileno de Arte Preco- lombino, Santiago.
  7. 2001b. Alfarería y política. En Tras la huella del Inka en Chile, C. Aldunate y L. Cornejo (Eds.), pp. 114-121. Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino, Santiago.
  8. COVEY, A., 2006. Chronology, succession and sovereignty: The politics of Inka historiography and its modern interpretation. Comparative Studies in Society and History 48 (1): 169-199.
  9. D'ALTROY, T., A. LORANDI, V. WILLIAMS, M. CALDERARI, C. HASTORF, E. DEMARRAIS y M. HAGSTRUM, 2000. Inka rule in the Northern Calchaquí Valley, Argentina. Journal of Field Archaeology 27 (1): 1-26.
  10. GALLARDO, F., M. URIBE y P. AYALA, 1995. Arquitectura inka y poder en el Pukara de Turi. Gaceta Arqueológica Andina 24 (7): 151-172.
  11. HOGG, A., H. QUAN, P. BLACKWELL, N. MU NIU, C. BUCK, T GUILDERSON, T. HEATON, J. PALMER, P. REIMER, R. REIMER, C. TURNEY y S. ZIMMERMAN, 2013. Shcal13 southern hemisphere calibration, 0-50.000 years cal. BP. Ra- diocarbon 55 (4): 1889-1903.
  12. LLAGOSTERA, A., 1976. Hipótesis sobre la expansión incaica en la vertiente occidental de los Andes Meridionales. Homenaje al Dr. Gustavo Le Paige, J. M. Cassasas (Ed.), pp. 203-218. Universidad del Norte, Antofagasta.
  13. MCCORMAC, S., 2001. History, historical record and ceremonial action: Incas and Spaniards in Cuzco. Comparative Studies in So- ciety and History 43 (2): 329-363.
  14. MCCORMAC, F., A. HOGG, P. BLACKWELL, C. BUCK, T. HIGHAM y P. REIMER, 2004. SHCal04 Southern Hemisphe- re Calibration 0-11.0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46 (3): 1087-1092.
  15. PÄRSSINEN. M., 2005. Caquiaviri y la Provincia de Pacasa. Desde el Alto Formativo hasta la conquista española (1-1533). Colección Maes- tría en Historias Andinas y Amazónicas, La Paz. Nº 47 / 2014 Estudios Atacameños Arqueología y Antropología Surandinas Luis Cornejo PÄRSSINEN, M. y A. SIIRIÄNEN, 1997. Inca-style ceramics and their chronological relationship to the Inca expanssion in the Southern Lake Titicaca Area (Bolivia). Latin American Antiquity 8 (3): 255-272.
  16. PAVLOVIC, D., A. TRONCOSO, C. BECKER, J. RODRÍGUEZ y P. GONZÁLEZ, 2010. Escobillados, cuarto estilo y grandes conte- nedores. El conjunto alfarero inca en la provincia del Choapa. Actas de XVII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Chilena, vol. 2, pp. 285-296.
  17. PLANELLA, M. T. y R. STEHBERG, 1994. Etnohistoria y arqueo- logía en el estudio de la fortaleza indígena de Cerro Grande de la Compañía. Chungara 26 (1): 65-78.
  18. REYES, V., M. HENRÍQUEZ y J. SANHUEZA, 2005. Cemen- terio incaico Estación Quinta Normal, Línea 5 del Metro de Santiago. Actas del XVI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Chilena, vol. 1, pp. 655-664. Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, DIBAM, Concepción.
  19. RODRÍGUEZ, J., 2006. La Cultura Diaguita en la frontera meridio- nal. Actas del XVI Congreso Nacional de Arqueología, vol. 1, pp. 139- 146. Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, DIBAM, Concepción.
  20. ROWE, J., 1944. An introduction to the archaeology of Cuzco. Pa- pers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 22 (2). Harvard University, Cambridge.
  21. SALAZAR, D., J. BERENGUER y G. VEGA, 2013. Paisajes minero- metalúrgicos incaicos en Atacama y el altiplano sur de Tarapacá (norte de Chile). Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 45 (1): 83-103.
  22. SCHIAPPACASSE, V. y H. NIEMEYER, 2002. Ceremonial inca provincial: El asentamiento de Saguara (cuenca de Camarones). Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 34 (1): 53-84.
  23. SCHIFFER, M., 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the "old wood" pro- blem: The case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeolo- gical Science 13 (1): 13-30.
  24. SILVERBLATT, I., 1988. Imperial dilemmas, the politics of kinship, and Inca reconstructions of History. Comparative Studies in Society and History 30 (1): 83-102.
  25. __ 2004. El inka y el poder como problemas de la arqueología del Norte Grande de Chile. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 36 (2): 313-324.
  26. ZORI, C. y P. TROPPER, 2010. Late pre-hispanic and early colo- nial silver production in the quebrada de Tarapacá, northern Chile. Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino 15 (2): 65-87.
  27. ZUIDEMA, T., 1982. Myth and history in ancient Peru. En The logic of culture, I. Rossi (Ed.), pp. 150-175.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cornejo, L.
Venue
Estudios atacameños
Publisher
Universidad Catolica del Norte - Chile
Published
2014
Issue
47
Pages
101-116
ISSN
0718-1043
DOI
10.4067/s0718-10432014000100007
Cited by
29
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review