The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEL GÉNESIS A LOS ANDES: LA CRONOLOGÍA DEL INCARIO EN LA HISTORIA DE LOS INCAS DE PEDRO SARMIENTO DE GAMBOA (1572)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sarmiento de Gamboa offers an unrealistic chronology based on a subjective and eclectic mix of dates from the Bible, Greek texts, the Spanish royal line, and interviews.
“Only two other chroniclers proposed absolute dates for the Inca, most notably Sarmiento de Gamboa (2007), who offers an unrealistic chronology based on a subjective and eclectic mix of dates from the Bible, Greek texts, the Spanish royal line, and interviews (González Díaz 2015: 170-3).”
From Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina (2017) · cites this paper as González Díaz 2015
The Conclusions describe Sarmiento’s use of Hebrew chronology, Plato, Spanish chronicles, and information from Cusco elites; the paper also identifies inconsistencies in his dates. It does not establish that he took dates from the Spanish royal line specifically: the royal succession appears in its discussion of Chávez’s chronology. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconceiving the chronology of inca imperial expansion
Ogburn, D. E. (2012) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.v54i2.16014 · Cited by 118
Barton, J. (1990) · Journal of Jewish Studies · doi:10.18647/1547/jjs-1990 · Cited by 33
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- ALFONSO X. 2009. General estoria. Primera parte, I y II. Fundación José Antonio de Castro, Madrid. ANÓNIMO. 1848 [1571]. de carta que segun una nota se ha- llaba en el archivo general de Indias, y que hemos rectificado con otra que tenemos á la vista, donde se trata el verdadero y legítimo dominio de los Reyes de España sobre el Perú, y se impugna la opinion del Padre Fr. Bartolomé de las Casas (AKA El parecer de Yucay). En Colección de documentos inéditos para la historia de España, tomo XIII, M. Salvá y P. Sainz (Comps.), pp. 425-469.
- Imprenta de la viuda de Calero, Madrid. __ 1995 [1571]. El parecer de Yucay. Edición crítica de I. Pérez. En El Anónimo de Yucay frente a Bartolomé de Las Casas, I. Pérez (Ed.), pp. 111-171. Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas, Cusco.
- BARNES, M. 1995. Las edades del hombre y del mundo según Hie- rónimo Chaves, de Sevilla, y Guaman Poma de Ayala, del Perú. En Humanismo siglo XX: estudios dedicados al dr. Juan Adolfo Vázquez, J. Schobinger (Comp.), pp. 291-297. Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan.
- BAUER, B. y V. SMITH. 2007. Introduction, notes and appendices to the The History of the Incas. En History of the incas, B. Bauer y V. Smith-Oka. University of Texas Press, Austin.
- COVEY, A. 2015. Chronology, inca. En Encyclopedia of the Incas, G. Urton y A. Von Hagen (Eds.). Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland.
- FLEMING, D. 1994. Guaman Poma, Hieronymo de Chaves and the Kings of Persia. Latin American Indian Literatures Journal 10(1): 46-60.
- 2012b. Guaman Poma y el Repertorio anónimo (1554). Una nueva fuente para las edades del mundo en la Nueva Corónica y Buen Gobierno. Chungara 44(3): 377-388.
- HERNÁNDEZ , F. 2012. La sucesión entre los incas. Chungara 44(4): 655-667.
- HUGHES, J. 1990. Secrets of the times. Myth and history in biblical chro- nology. JSOT Press, Sheffield.
- JULIEN, C. 2000. Reading inca history. University of Iowa press, Iowa. __ 2006. Introducción. En Relaçion de como los españoles entraron en el Peru o History of how the spaniards arrived in Peru, C. Julien (Ed).
- LYNCH, J. 2012. Una aproximación cronológica al centro adminis- trativo Hualfín Inka, Catamarca, Argentina. Revista Española de Antropología Americana 42(2): 321-337.
- MARTÍNEZ, J. 2012. El virrey Toledo y el control de las voces an- dinas coloniales. Colonial Latin American Review 21(2): 175-208.
- PÉREZ, I. 1995. Estudio crítico preliminar a El parecer de Yucay. En El Anónimo de Yucay frente a Bartolomé de Las Casas. Edición crítica del Parecer de Yucay, I, Pérez (Ed.), pp. 13-110. Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas, Cusco.
- PLAS, S. 1996. Une source européenne de la Nueva Corónica y buen gobierno de Guaman Poma. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 82: 97-116.
- ROSENBLAT, A. 1942. Introducción y notas a La Historia de los Incas. En La Historia de los Incas, P. Sarmiento de Gamboa. Ángel Ro- senblat (ed.). EMECE, Buenos Aires.
- ROWE, J. 1945. Absolute chronology in the andean area. American antiquity 10 (3): 265-284. __ 1978. La fecha de muerte de Wayna Qhapaq. Histórica II(1): 83-88.
- TOLEDO, F. 1940 [1570-1572]. Informaciones sobre el origen y descendencia de los incas. En Don Francisco de Toledo. Supremo organizador del Perú, II, R. Levillier (Ed.), pp. 122-181.
- Imprenta Porter, Buenos Aires. __ 2008 [1570-1572]. Informaciones sobre el origen y descen- dencia de los incas. En Memoria histórica y gobierno imperial, M. Merluzzi (Ed.), pp. 57-178.
- VACCARELLA, E. 2007. Fábulas, letras and razones historiales fidedignas: the praxis of renaissance historiography in Pedro Sarmiento de Gamboa's Historia de los Incas. Colonial Latin Ame- rican Review 16(1): 93-107.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dating the expansion of the inca empire: bayesian models from Ecuador and Argentina
Marsh, E. J., Kidd, R., Ogburn, D., & Durán, V. (2017) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2016.118 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- González Díaz, S.
- Venue
- Estudios atacameños
- Published
- 2015-12
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 153-175
- ISSN
- 0718-1043
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
