CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Higher Education in Latin AmericaEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentEducation and Public Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Análisis de la acreditación de calidad en programas de ingeniería industrial y los resultados en las pruebas nacionales estandarizadas, en Colombia

Open access
Delahoz-Dominguez, Enrique J., Guillen-Ibarra, Sergio, Fontalvo-Herrera, Tomás·2020·Formación universitaria
DOI 10.4067/s0718-50062020000100127
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

ResumenEl presente artículo presenta un análisis relacional entre las acreditaciones universitarias sobre calidad en programas de ingeniería industrial y el resultado en las pruebas estandarizadas de la educación superior en Colombia, usando técnicas de aprendizaje automático.Primero, se desarrolló una revisión literaria concerniente a las acreditaciones sobre calidad, evaluación del desempeño organizacional y técnicas de aprendizaje automático.Segundo, se desarrolló un análisis de componentes principales para identificar factores de agrupación entre las universidades estudiadas.En tercer lugar, se evaluaron modelos de aprendizaje supervisado, para pronosticar la acreditación de una institución según los resultados en los exámenes estandarizados.Los resultados muestran que la componente de comunicación escrita es una variable crítica para determinar la clasificación de universidades como acreditadas.En conclusión, la evidencia empírica muestra la existencia de una relación compatible de contar con una acreditación sobre calidad y tener un buen desempeño en los resultados de las pruebas estandarizadas.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-50062020000100127

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Delahoz-Dominguez, E. J., Guillen-Ibarra, S., & Fontalvo-Herrera, T.
Affiliations
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar (CO)
Venue
Formación universitaria
Publisher
SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID)
Published
2020-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
127-134
ISSN
0718-5006 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4067/s0718-50062020000100127
OpenAlex
W3006122074
Cited by
16
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Formación universitaria (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositorio UTB (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositorio UTB (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
Keywords
higher education accreditation, higher education quality assurance, industrial engineering program, university performance, writing skills, supervised learning models, principal component analysis, organizational performance evaluation, Colombian universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review