Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Entre humos, fuegos y pinturas: Una metodología para conectar historias en el arte rupestre

Gheco, Lucas, Gastaldi, Marcos, Mastrangelo, Noemí, Quesada, Marcos, Marte, Fernando, Tascón, Marcos·2019·Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-68942019000100131

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One rock shelter, Oyola 7, was excavated, yielding information that enabled interpretation of an occupation pattern marked by alternating periods of greater and lesser activity, without evidence of permanent residential use.

    “one of these rock shelter-Oyola 7was excavated, yielding information that enabled the interpretation of an occupation pattern marked by alternating periods of greater and lesser activity, without evidence of permanent residential use”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aschero, C. 1988. Pinturas rupestres, actividades y recursos naturales: un encuadre arqueológico. En Arqueología contemporánea argentina. Actualidad y perspectivas, Yaco- baccio, H., Borrero, L. A., García, L., Politis, G., Aschero & C., Bellelli, C., Eds., pp. 109-142. Buenos Aires: Búsqueda.
  2. Aschero, C. 2006. De cazadores y pastores. El arte rupestre de la modalidad Río Punilla en Antofagasta de la Sierra y la cuestión de la complejidad en la puna meridional ar- gentina. En Tramas en la piedra. Producción y usos del arte rupestre, Fiore, D., Podestá, M., Eds., pp. 103-140. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, aina, wac.
  3. Berna, F., Goldberg, P., Horwitz, L. K., Brink, J., Holt, S., Bamford, M. & Chazan, M. 2012. Microstratigraphic evi- dence of in situ fire in the Acheulean strata of Wonderwerk Cave, Northern Cape province, South Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: E1215-E1220. Washington: National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
  4. David, B., McNiven, I., Attenbrow, V., Flood, J. & Coll- ins, J. 1994. Of Lightning Brothers and white cockatoos: dating the antiquity of signifying systems in the Northern Territory, Australia. Antiquity 68: 241-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. De la Fuente, N., Nazar, D. C. & Pelli, E. 2005. Documenta- ción y diagnóstico del arte rupestre de La Tunita, Provincia de Catamarca, República Argentina. En La Cultura de La Aguada y sus expresiones regionales, S. E. Martín & M. E. Gonaldi, Eds., pp. 227-244. La Rioja: eudelar.
  6. Gheco, L., Gastaldi, M., Marte, F., Quesada, M., Tascóon, M. & Mastrangelo, N. 2017. About fires and paintings: three stratigraphic insights on the history of a cave with prehispanic rock art. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 15: 48-58. Elsevier.
  7. Gheco, L. & Poliszuk, A. 2015. Caracterización química de pinturas rupestres prehispánicas del sitio arqueológico de Oyola mediante sem-eds, drx, ft-ir, frx y gc-ms (Catamarca, Argentina). En Arqueometría Argentina, metodologías científicas aplicadas al estudio de los bienes culturales: datación, caracterización, prospección y conservación, A. A. Pifferetti & I. Dosztal, Eds., pp. 271-284. Buenos Aires: Aspha.
  8. Luján, F. C., Castillo, S. U. & March, R. J. 2015. El uso del fuego en el complejo arqueológico de las Huacas del Sol y de la Luna, Perú. Un primer ensayo de tipología de las áreas de combustión. Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Études Andines 44: 53-89.
  9. Marte, F., Careaga, V. P., Mastrangelo, N., De Faria, D. L. A. & Maier, M. S. 2014. The Sibyls from the church of San Pedro Telmo: a micro-Raman spectroscopic investigation. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 45: 1046-1051. Wiley.
  10. Mentzer, S. M. 2012. Microarchaeological approaches to the identification and interpretation of combustion features in prehistoric archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21: 616-668. Springer. Entre humos, fuegos y pinturas / Gheco et al.
  11. Pauketat, T. R. & Alt, S. M. 2005. Agency in a postmold? Physicality and the archaeology of culture-making. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 12: 213-237. Springer.
  12. Tascón, M., Mastrangelo, N., Gheco, L., Gastaldi, M., Quesada, M. & Marte, F. 2016. Micro-spectroscopic analysis of pigments and carbonization layers on pre- hispanic rock art at the Oyola's caves, Argentina, using a stratigraphic approach. Microchemical Journal 129: 297-304. Elsevier.
  13. Troncoso, A., Vergara, F., González, P., Larach, P., Pino, M. & Moya, F. 2014. Arte rupestre, prácticas socio- espaciales y la construcción de comunidades en el norte semiárido de Chile (Valle de Limarí). En: Distribución espacial en sociedades no aldeanas: del registro arqueológico a la interpretación social, F. Falabella, L. Sanhueza & L. Cornejo, Eds., pp. 89-115. Santiago: Serie Monográfica de la Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gheco, L., Gastaldi, M., Mastrangelo, N., Quesada, M., Marte, F., & Tascón, M.
Venue
Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino
Published
2019-06
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
131-152
ISSN
0718-6894
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review