Cited by 23Malaria Research and ControlMosquito-borne diseases and controlHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A breeding site model for regional, dynamical malaria simulations evaluated using in situ temporary ponds observations

Open access

Abstract

Daily observations of potential mosquito developmental habitats in a suburb of Kumasi in central Ghana reveal a strong variability in their water persistence times, which ranged between 11 and 81 days. The persistence of the ponds was strongly tied with rainfall, location and size of the puddles. A simple power-law relationship is found to fit the relationship between the average pond depth and area well. A prognostic water balance model is derived that describes the temporal evolution of the pond area and depth, incorporating the power-law geometrical relation. Pond area increases in response to rainfall, while evaporation and infiltration act as sink terms. Based on a range of evaluation metrics, the prognostic model is judged to provide a good representation of the pond coverage evolution at most sites. Finally, we demonstrate that the prognostic equation can be generalised and equally applied to a grid-cell to derive a fractional pond coverage, and thus can be implemented in spatially distributed models for relevant vector- borne diseases such as malaria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4081/gh.2016.390

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most attempts to represent surface hydrology in malaria transmission modeling resort to a simple conceptual water balance model to determine the availability of water for larval habitats.

    “Most resort to a simple conceptual water balance model to determine the availability of water for larval habitats (Asare, Tompkins, Amekudzi, & Ermert, 2016; Montosi et al., 2012; Parham et al., 2012; Patz et al., 1998), while only a few have proposed more sophisticated hydrologic models that further consider canopy processes and subsurface flows (Bomblies et al., 2008; Le et al., 2018).”

    From Investigating the Impact of Irrigation on Malaria Vector Larval Habitats and Transmission Using a Hydrology‐Based Model (2023) · cites this paper as Asare, Tompkins, Amekudzi, & Ermert, 2016

    The Discussion describes the paper’s own water-balance model for predicting pond coverage, so it supports citing this study as an example of that approach. But the Introduction says most dynamical malaria models have no representation of surface hydrology, rather than saying most use a simple water-balance model. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayashi M, Van der Kamp G, 2007. Water level changes in ponds and lakes: the hydrological processes. In: Johnson EA, Miyanishi K, eds. Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the response. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 311-39.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Asare, E. O., Tompkins, A. M., Amekudzi, L. K., & Ermert, V.
Affiliations
  • The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Geospatial Health
Published
2016-03-31
Volume
11
Issue
1s
Pages
390-390
ISSN
  • 1827-1987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1970-7096
OpenAlex
W2319114615
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geospatial health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • European Commission (243964, 266327)
  • Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
mosquito breeding sites, temporary ponds, water balance model, rainfall, Kumasi
MeSH terms
Animals, Ghana, Malaria, Models, Theoretical, Culicidae, Rain, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Ponds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review