Cited by 76Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionCognitive Functions and Memory

Concussion Baseline Testing: Preexisting Factors, Symptoms, and Neurocognitive Performance

Open access
Cottle, Jordan E., Hall, Eric E., Patel, Kirtida, Barnes, Kenneth P., Ketcham, Caroline J.·2017·Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract

Context: Neurocognitive test scores are often considered an important aspect of concussion management. To best use these data, clinicians must understand potential factors that may influence baseline performance on these tests. Objective: To determine preexisting factors that may influence performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 486 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I collegiate student-athletes. Main Outcome Measure(s): To determine neurocognitive functioning and total symptom score at baseline, ImPACT was administered. Outcomes were verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and total symptom score. A self-report demographic section at the beginning of ImPACT was used to gather information concerning previous treatment for headaches, migraines, and psychiatric conditions; diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; and exposure to previous strenuous exercise. We conducted multivariate analyses of variance to determine if the ImPACT composite and total symptom scores differed according to preexisting factors (P < .0083). Results: Sex showed an effect on verbal memory (P = .001), visual motor speed (P < .001), and reaction time (P = .006), with women performing better than men. A previous diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder affected visual motor speed (P = .008). Previous treatment for headaches (P < .001), migraines (P = .001), a psychiatric condition (P < .001), or a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (P < .001) all showed effects on the total symptom score. Strenuous exercise did not affect neurocogntive performance or total symptom score. Conclusions: Based on our findings and the previous literature, we suggest that many preexisting factors influence baseline neurocognitive data. Baseline testing is an important aspect of concussion management. Sports medicine professionals should be cognizant of these factors when developing concussion-management protocols.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.21

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baseline testing on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test showed that women outperformed men on verbal memory and reaction times.

    “For instance, baseline testing on the Immediate PostConcussion Assessment and Cognitive Test showed that women outperformed men on verbal memory and reaction times. 106,107”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]28. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: mental health findings. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Web site. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHmhfr2013/NSDUHmhfr2013.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Authors
Cottle, J. E., Hall, E. E., Patel, K., Barnes, K. P., & Ketcham, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Elon University (US)
  • Greensboro Orthopaedics, NC
Venue
Journal of Athletic Training
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
77-81
ISSN
1062-6050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2569108018
Cited by
76
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Athletic Training (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Collegiate Athletic Association
  • American Medical Society for Sports Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
concussion, impact, student athletes, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, headache and migraine, psychiatric conditions, sex differences, visual motor speed, reaction time, concussion symptoms, concussion management
MeSH terms
Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review