Cited by 3Multilingual Education and PolicyAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Haidawood: A Social Media Approach to Indigenous Language Revitalization

Open access
Leslie, Kenneth·2016·Unity, Diversity and Culture

Abstract

British Columbia is home to 34 different Indigenous languages, most of which are in danger of losing fluency due to the combined effects of introduced diseases and assimilationist Indian Residential Schools. The Haida language, or Xaad Kil (pronounced “haad kill”), is considered critically endangered with only 9 elderly fluent speakers left. Many Haida believe that revitalizing Xaad Kil is important for keeping their culture alive: they see Xaad Kil as a cultural keystone that keeps worldview, artistic expression, food gathering, dances, stories, and songs integrated together as a unified whole. Xaad Kil also helps assert Aboriginal land rights: identification of traditional place names demonstrates use and occupation of lands since time immemorial. Xaad Kil names of medicinal plants and foods also contain important environmental information. Indigenous communities are adopting a range of strategies to revitalize their languages, including: master-apprentice programs, early childhood immersion programs, and technological approaches such as audio databases, language apps, and social media projects like Haidawood. Learning Xaad Kil can be a challenge: there are limited resources and often language learners are overwhelmed with obstacles. Haidawood helps make Haida language learning fun by bringing Haida stories to life using the power of stop motion animation and embracing an “aesthetic of accessibility” that creates beautiful art out of readily available materials, including carved puppet faces and sets made from cardboard. Haidawood seeks to help revitalize the Haida language, facilitate inter-cultural understanding, and inspire other communities to preserve and share their own stories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4087/fghy9004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Leslie, K.
Corresponding author
Leslie, Kenneth
Venue
Unity, Diversity and Culture
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2943307008
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP) (publishedVersion)
  • Language arts journal of Michigan (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Keywords
Haida language, language revitalization, indigenous languages, social media, stop-motion animation, endangered languages, cultural preservation, accessibility, language learning, Indigenous peoples of British Columbia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Haidawood: A Social Media Approach to Indigenous Language Revitalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4087/fghy9004
The paper
Leslie, K. (2016). Haidawood: A Social Media Approach to Indigenous Language Revitalization. Unity, Diversity and Culture. https://doi.org/10.4087/fghy9004