The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Meta-analyze all published epidemiologic studies reporting pediatric mania or bipolar disorder to investigate whether pediatric bipolar disorder is becoming more prevalent and whether rates vary significantly by country. DATA SOURCES: Searches of PubMed and PsycInfo were conducted through the spring of 2010 using the following search terms: child, pediatric, young, adolescent, epidemiology, prevalence, bipolar, mania, suicide, and psychiatric. We also manually reviewed references in recent reviews of epidemiology of bipolar disorder. STUDY SELECTION: All studies reporting rates for mania or hypomania in community epidemiologic samples with participants up to 21 years of age. DATA EXTRACTION: All articles were coded to extract relevant variables. Prevalence rates were calculated from reported number of cases with bipolar disorders, then logit transformed. Twelve studies were included, enrolling 16,222 youths between the ages of 7 and 21 years during a period from 1985 to 2007. Six samples were from the United States; 6 were from other countries (the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Mexico, Ireland, and New Zealand). RESULTS: The overall rate of bipolar disorder was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.0%). There was no significant difference in the mean rates between US and non-US studies, but the US studies had a wider range of rates. The highest estimates came from studies that used broad definitions and included bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. Year of enrollment was negatively correlated with prevalence (r = -0.04) and remained nonsignificant when controlling for study methodological differences. CONCLUSIONS: Mean rates of bipolar disorder were higher than commonly acknowledged and not significantly different in US compared to non-US samples, nor was there evidence of an increase in rates of bipolar disorder in the community over time. Differences in diagnostic criteria were a main driver of different rates across studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yatham, L. N., Kennedy, S. H., Parikh, S. V., Schaffer, A., Bond, D. J., Frey, B. N., Sharma, V., Goldstein, B. I., Rej, S., Beaulieu, S., et al. (2018) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12609 · Cited by 1,852
Irritability in child and adolescent psychopathology: An integrative review for ICD-11
Evans, S. C., Burke, J. D., Roberts, M. C., Fite, P. J., Lochman, J. E., de la Peña, F. R., & Reed, G. M. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.004 · Cited by 186
Joslyn, C., Hawes, D. J., Hunt, C., & Mitchell, P. B. (2016) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12419 · Cited by 179
Hauser, M., Galling, B., & Correll, C. U. (2013) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12094 · Cited by 168
DelBello, M. P., Goldman, R., Phillips, D., Deng, L., Cucchiaro, J., & Loebel, A. (2017) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2017.10.006 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Meter, A. R., Moreira, A. L. R., & Youngstrom, E. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2011-05-31
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 1250-1256
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060761527
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.10m06290
- The paper
- Van Meter, A. R., Moreira, A. L. R., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2011). Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.10m06290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.