Cited by 9Mental Health Treatment and AccessClimate Change and Health ImpactsBipolar Disorder and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Climate and Prevalence of Mood Disorders: A Cross-National Correlation Study

Open access
Rotgé, Jean-Yves, Fossati, Philippe, Lemogne, Cedric·2014·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Article AbstractBecause this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text. To the Editor: Seasonal climate variations are notably known to affect mood in both individuals with and individuals without mental disorders. Intriguingly, the prevalence of mood disorders differs greatly from one country to another. For example, lifetime prevalence has been measured at 21% in France and the United States, compared with under 5% in Nigeria.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.13l08810

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One multi-country study reported that the highest prevalence of mood disorders is observed in countries characterised by small variations across monthly rainfall and high levels of rainfall.

    “One multi-country study has looked at rainfall as a climate-related exposure and has reported that the highest prevalence of mood disorders is observed in countries characterised by small variations across monthly rainfall and high levels of rainfall [38].”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

  • Only four studies have focused on protective factors or the coping mechanisms people and communities have used when responding to the detrimental mental health impacts of climate change.

    “While the overwhelming focus on the mental health risks of climate change is understandable and has generated insight and traction for advocating the importance of considering mental health within climate change, only four studies have focused on protective factors or the coping mechanisms people and communities have used when responding to the detrimental mental health impacts of climate change [”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rotgé, J.-Y., Fossati, P., & Lemogne, C.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
75
Issue
04
Pages
408
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985322499
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
mood disorders, seasonal climate variability, prevalence, cross-national comparison, lifetime prevalence, seasonal affective disorder
MeSH terms
Climate, Humans, Rain, Temperature, Global Health, Prevalence, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review