Cited by 71Cardiac Health and Mental HealthTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Escitalopram Treatment for Depressive Disorder Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A 24-Week Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Kim, Jae-Min, Bae, Kyung-Yeol, Stewart, Robert, Jung, Bo-Ok, Kang, Hee-Ju, Kim, Sung-Wan, Shin, Il-Seon, Hong, Young Joon +7 more·2015·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Depression is common after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and has adverse effects on prognosis. There are few evidence-based interventions for treating depression in ACS. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of escitalopram in treating depressive disorders identified 2-14 weeks after a confirmed ACS episode. Method A total of 217 patients with DSM-IV depressive disorders (121 major and 96 minor) and ACS were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram in flexible doses of 5-20 mg/d (n = 108) or placebo (n = 109) for 24 weeks. The study was conducted from 2007 to 2013. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Secondary outcome measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-12. Cardiovascular safety outcomes included echocardiography, electrocardiography, laboratory test, body weight, and blood pressure results. Results Escitalopram was superior to placebo in reducing HDRS scores (mean difference = 2.3, P = .016, effect size = 0.38). Escitalopram was also superior to placebo in decreasing depressive symptoms evaluated by the MADRS, BDI, and CGI-S and in improving SOFAS functioning level. Escitalopram was not associated with any harmful changes in cardiovascular safety measures. Dizzin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 71

Authors
Kim, J.-M., Bae, K.-Y., Stewart, R., Jung, B.-O., Kang, H.-J., Kim, S.-W., Shin, I.-S., Hong, Y. J., Kim, J. H., Shin, H.-Y., Kang, G., Ahn, Y., Kim, J.-K., Jeong, M. H., & Yoon, J.-S.
Affiliations
Chonnam National University (KR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2014-10-14
Volume
76
Issue
01
Pages
62-68
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035697132
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
escitalopram, depression, acute coronary syndrome, antidepressant efficacy, cardiovascular safety, major depressive disorder, minor depressive disorder, dizziness, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Aged, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review