Cited by 84Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTryptophan and brain disorders

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of Vortioxetine in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Mahableshwarkar, Atul R., Jacobsen, Paula L., Serenko, Michael, Chen, Yinzhong, Trivedi, Madhukar H.·2015·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted August 2010-May 2012 in the United States, evaluated the safety and efficacy of vortioxetine 10 mg and 15 mg in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The mechanism of action of vortioxetine is thought to be related to direct modulation of serotonin (5-HT) receptor activity and inhibition of the serotonin transporter. METHOD: Adults aged 18-75 years with MDD (DSM-IV-TR) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥ 26 were randomized (1:1:1) to receive vortioxetine 10 mg or 15 mg or placebo once daily, with the primary efficacy end point being change from baseline at week 8 in MADRS analyzed by mixed model for repeated measures. Adverse events were recorded during the study, suicidal ideation and behavior were assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), and sexual dysfunction was assessed using the Arizona Sexual Experience (ASEX) scale. RESULTS: Of the 1,111 subjects screened, 469 subjects were randomized: 160 to placebo, 157 to vortioxetine 10 mg, and 152 to vortioxetine 15 mg. Differences from placebo in the primary efficacy end point were not statistically significant for vortioxetine 10 mg or vortioxetine 15 mg. Nausea, headache, dry mouth, constipation, diarrhea, vomiting, dizziness, and flatulence were reported in ≥ 5% of subjects receiving vortioxetine. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 7 subjects (4.4%) in the placebo group, 8 (5.2%) in the vortioxetine 10 mg group, and 12 (7.9%) in the vortioxetine 15 mg group. ASEX total scores were similar across groups. There were no clinically significant trends within or between treatment groups on the C-SSRS, laboratory values, electrocardiogram, or vital sign parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, vortioxetine did not differ significantly from placebo on MADRS total score after 8 weeks of treatment in MDD subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01179516.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09337

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 84

Authors
Mahableshwarkar, A. R., Jacobsen, P. L., Serenko, M., Chen, Y., & Trivedi, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Trivedi, Madhukar H.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-27
Volume
76
Issue
05
Pages
583-591
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W810408096
Cited by
84
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
vortioxetine, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, serotonin transporter inhibition, dose comparison, adverse events, sexual dysfunction, suicidal ideation, placebo response, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, drug safety, adults with depression, treatment-resistant depression, relapse prevention, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Vortioxetine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Placebos, Sulfides, Treatment Failure, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review