Cited by 24Medication Adherence and ComplianceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsWireless Body Area Networks

Developing a Digital Medicine System in Psychiatry: Ingestion Detection Rate and Latency Period

Open access
Profit, Deborah, Rohatagi, Shashank, Zhao, Cathy, Hatch, Ainslie, Docherty, John P., Peters-Strickland, Timothy S.·2016·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A digital medicine system (DMS) has been developed to measure and report adherence to an atypical antipsychotic, aripiprazole, in psychiatric patients. The DMS consists of 3 components: ingestible sensor embedded in a medication tablet, wearable sensor, and secure mobile and cloud-based applications. An umbrella study protocol was designed to rapidly assess the technical performance and safety of the DMS in multiple substudies to guide the technology development. METHODS: Two sequential substudies enrolled 30 and 29 healthy volunteers between March-April 2014 and February-March 2015, respectively, to assess detection accuracy of the ingestible sensor by the DMS and the latency period between ingestion and detection of the ingestion by the wearable sensor or the cloud-based server. RESULTS: The first substudy identified areas for improvement using early versions of the wearable sensor and the mobile application. The second substudy tested updated versions of the components and showed an overall ingestion detection rate of 96.6%. Mean latency times for the signal transmission were 1.1-1.3 minutes (from ingestion to the wearable sensor detection) and 6.2-10.3 minutes (from the wearable sensor detection to the server detection). Half of transmissions were completed in < 2 minutes, and ~90% of ingestions were registered by the smartphone within 30 minutes of ingestion. No serious adverse events, discontinuations, or clinically significant laboratory/vital signs findings were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The DMS implementing modified versions of the smartphone application and the wearable sensor has the technical capability to detect and report tablet ingestion with high accuracy and acceptable latency time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02091882.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.16m10643

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 24

Authors
Profit, D., Rohatagi, S., Zhao, C., Hatch, A., Docherty, J. P., & Peters-Strickland, T. S.
Affiliations
Otsuka (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Profit, Deborah
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
77
Issue
09
Pages
e1095-e1100
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2464751096
Cited by
24
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
medication adherence, aripiprazole, atypical antipsychotics, ingestible sensors, wearable sensors, mobile application, cloud applications, latency, psychiatric patients, technology safety
MeSH terms
Cloud Computing, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Informatics Applications, Middle Aged, Psychiatry, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tablets, Time Factors, Biosensing Techniques, Medication Adherence, Young Adult, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review