Cited by 11Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

How Interpersonal Psychotherapy Changes the Brain: A Study of fMRI in Borderline Personality Disorder

Open access
Bozzatello, Paola, Morese, Rosalba, Valentini, Maria Consuelo, Rocca, Paola, Bellino, Silvio·2021·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Recent guidelines and systematic reviews suggest that disorder-specific psychotherapeutic interventions are the first choice in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD). The aim of this study is to examine brain activity changes in BPD patients ( DSM-5 ) who received a revised BPD-adapted interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-BPD-R) compared with patients on the waiting list. Methods: Forty-three patients with a BPD diagnosis ( DSM-5 ) were randomly assigned to IPT-BPD-R (n = 22 patients) or the waiting list with clinical management (n = 21 patients) for 10 months. Both groups were tested before and after treatment with the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-version 11 (BIS-11), and the Autobiographical Interview. Both groups underwent pre- and posttreatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) testing. The fMRI task consisted of the presentation of resolved and unresolved life events compared to a neutral condition. All structural and functional images were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 software, which interfaces with MATLAB. Clinical data were analyzed using analysis of variance for repeated measures. Patients were recruited between September 2017 and April 2019. Results: In clinical results, for the 4 rating scales, a significant between-subje…

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.21m13918

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 11

Authors
Bozzatello, P., Morese, R., Valentini, M. C., Rocca, P., & Bellino, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2021-11-16
Volume
83
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W4288072538
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, interpersonal psychotherapy, brain activity changes, temporoparietal junction, anterior cingulate cortex, mentalization, impulsivity, functional MRI, psychotherapy outcome, waitlist control, social and occupational functioning, autobiographical memory, autobiographical interviews, disease severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review