Cited by 1Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicidality Emerging From Rapid Venlafaxine Discontinuation: A Challenge–Dechallenge–Rechallenge Case Report

Open access
Kostic, Milutin, Plöder, Martin, Hengartner, Michael, Buzejic, Jelena·2024·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

There is ongoing controversy about suicide risk associated with antidepressant use, but much less is known about suicide risk related to discontinuation of antidepressants. Antidepressant withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can be a burdensome syndrome, with well-known symptoms. One possible explanation for this condition is the oppositional model of tolerance. Some study results are suggestive that suicidality can be part of AWS, although the data are still inconclusive. We are aware of only 3 case reports of suicidal behavior with antidepressant discontinuation, which occurred after discontinuation of paroxetine, venlafaxine, and escitalopram. In this case report, we present a patient without a history of suicidal crisis who, in the span of 6 months, experienced 2 suicidal crises, each occurring directly following rapid discontinuation of venlafaxine. Both crises subsided with reintroduction of the drug.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.23cr14930

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hengartner MP, Plöderl M. Newer-generation antidepressants and suicide risk in randomized controlled trials: a re-analysis of the FDA database. Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(4):247-248.
  2. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 2. Hayes JF, Lewis G, Lewis G. Newer-generation antidepressants and suicide risk. Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(6):371-372. · DOI
  3. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 3. Massabki I, Abi-Jaoude E. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor 'discontinuation syndrome' or withdrawal. Br J Psychiatry. 2021;218(3):168-171. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Kostic, M., Plöder, M., Hengartner, M., & Buzejic, J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2024-01-22
Volume
85
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W4391019364
Cited by
1
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
antidepressant discontinuation, antidepressant withdrawal syndrome, suicidality, suicide risk, venlafaxine, suicidal crisis
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Humans, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review