Cited by 6Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Depression at 2 Months Postpartum: Results From the French National Perinatal Survey

Doncarli, Alexandra, Demiguel, Virginie, Ray, Camille Le, Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine, Lebreton, Elodie, Apter, Gisèle, Boudet-Berquier, Julie, Chantry, Anne Alice +4 more·2025·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Estimate nationwide postpartum depression (PPD) at 2 months prevalence and its related risk factors. Methods: The representative study sample comprised 7,133 women who were included in a national perinatal population- based survey of all women who gave birth in France in March 2021. Data on maternal characteristics, course of pregnancy/delivery, and child's health were collected from face-to-face interviews in maternity wards and/or medical records and a self-questionnaire (including the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS]) at 2 months postpartum. Women with an EPDS score ≥13 were considered to have PPD. Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for PPD. Results: PPD prevalence at 2 months was 16.7% (95% CI, [15.7-17.7]). Factors significantly associated with PPD were (1) age ≤29 or ≥40 years (maximum aPR=1.41 95% CI, [1.12-1.77] obtained for 15- to 24-year-olds vs 35- to 39-year-olds); (2) being born in North Africa (1.29 [1.02-1.64] vs France); (3) having a lower level of health literacy (1.23 [1.14-1.35]); (4) having a history of psychological (1.45 [1.24-1.69]) or psychiatric (1.52 [1.23-1.88]) care since adolescence (vs none); (5) receiving little/ no support or good support during pregnancy (1.80 [1.52-2.14] and 1.31 [1.15-1.48] vs receiving very good support); (6) reporting feelings of sadness (1.92 [1.65-2.25]), anhedonia (1.69 [1.36-2.11]), or both (2.61 [2.26-3.01]) during pregnancy (vs…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.25m15818

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doncarli, A., Demiguel, V., Ray, C. L., Deneux-Tharaux, C., Lebreton, E., Apter, G., Boudet-Berquier, J., Chantry, A. A., Crenn-Hebert, C., Vacheron, M.-N., Regnault, N., & Tebeka, S.
Affiliations
  • Santé Publique France (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Groupe Hospitalier du Havre (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2025-10-08
Volume
86
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W4414963589
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, prevalence, risk factors, maternal mental health, perinatal period, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, health literacy, social support during pregnancy, anhedonia, instrumental delivery, maternal age, history of psychiatric care, France, child health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, France, Health Surveys, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review