The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent case reports suggest the association of the emergence of diabetes mellitus with clozapine treatment, although conventional neuroleptics have also been implicated. This study was conducted to determine if there is an increased risk of diabetes mellitus and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) during clozapine treatment compared with treatment with conventional depot neuroleptics. METHOD: In a district hospital in northern Sweden, blood glucose tests and, if necessary an oral glucose tolerance test were used to assess the prevalence of diabetes mellitus or IGT in 63 patients treated with clozapine compared with 67 patients treated with conventional depot neuroleptics (haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, fluphenazine, perphenazine, or flupenthixol). Diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance were classified according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: There were 3 dropouts in the clozapine group and 4 in the control group. Of subjects treated with clozapine, 12% (7/60) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 10% (6/60) had IGT. Of subjects treated with depot injections of neuroleptics, 6% (4/63) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 3% (2/63) had IGT. None in either group had type 1 diabetes mellitus. Subjects in the clozapine group were significantly (p < .001) younger than subjects in the control group, whereas the 2 groups did not differ with respect to body weight, body mass index, or prevalence of diabetes mellitus in first-degree relatives. CONCLUSION: Subjects treated with clozapine were more often classified as having type 2 diabetes mellitus or IGT compared with subjects in the control group. This difference did not, however, achieve statistical significance (p=.06).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis
Allison, D. B., Mentore, J. L., Heo, M., Chandler, L. P., Cappelleri, J. C., Infante, M. C., & Weiden, P. J. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.11.1686 · Cited by 2,382
Association of Diabetes Mellitus With Use of Atypical Neuroleptics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia
Sernyak, M. J., Leslie, D. L., Alarcon, R. D., Losonczy, M. F., & Rosenheck, R. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.4.561 · Cited by 623
Wu, R.-R., Zhao, J.-P., Jin, H., Shao, P., Fang, M.-S., Guo, X.-F., He, Y.-Q., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, J.-D., & Li, L.-H. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2007.56-b · Cited by 366
Atypical antipsychotics: new directions and new challenges in the treatment of schizophrenia
Kapur, S., & Remington, G. (2001) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.52.1.503 · Cited by 324
Nielsen, J., Skadhede, S., & Correll, C. U. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.78 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagg, S., Joelsson, L., Mjorndal, T., Spigset, O., Oja, G., & Dahlqvist, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 1998-06-15
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 294-299
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990561545
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v59n0604
- The paper
- Hagg, S., Joelsson, L., Mjorndal, T., Spigset, O., Oja, G., & Dahlqvist, R. (1998). Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v59n0604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.