Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications

Hagg, Staffan, Joelsson, Lars, Mjorndal, Tom, Spigset, Olav, Oja, Greta, Dahlqvist, Rune·1998·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent case reports suggest the association of the emergence of diabetes mellitus with clozapine treatment, although conventional neuroleptics have also been implicated. This study was conducted to determine if there is an increased risk of diabetes mellitus and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) during clozapine treatment compared with treatment with conventional depot neuroleptics. METHOD: In a district hospital in northern Sweden, blood glucose tests and, if necessary an oral glucose tolerance test were used to assess the prevalence of diabetes mellitus or IGT in 63 patients treated with clozapine compared with 67 patients treated with conventional depot neuroleptics (haloperidol, zuclopenthixol, fluphenazine, perphenazine, or flupenthixol). Diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance were classified according to World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: There were 3 dropouts in the clozapine group and 4 in the control group. Of subjects treated with clozapine, 12% (7/60) had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 10% (6/60) had IGT. Of subjects treated with depot injections of neuroleptics, 6% (4/63) had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 3% (2/63) had IGT. None in either group had type 1 diabetes mellitus. Subjects in the clozapine group were significantly (p < .001) younger than subjects in the control group, whereas the 2 groups did not differ with respect to body weight, body mass index, or prevalence of diabetes mellitus in first-degree relatives. CONCLUSION: Subjects treated with clozapine were more often classified as having type 2 diabetes mellitus or IGT compared with subjects in the control group. This difference did not, however, achieve statistical significance (p=.06).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v59n0604

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Hagg, S., Joelsson, L., Mjorndal, T., Spigset, O., Oja, G., & Dahlqvist, R.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
1998-06-15
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
294-299
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990561545
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v59n0604
The paper
Hagg, S., Joelsson, L., Mjorndal, T., Spigset, O., Oja, G., & Dahlqvist, R. (1998). Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Clozapine Compared With Patients Treated With Conventional Depot Neuroleptic Medications. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v59n0604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.