The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictors of Noncompliance in Patients With Schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Around 50% of patients with schizophrenia do not fully comply with treatment, and noncompliance is linked to relapse, rehospitalization, poor outcome, and high economic costs. The health belief model views noncompliance as a decision made by the patient, arrived at after weighing the perceived risks and benefits of treatment. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search for the years 1980-2002 using combinations of the keywords schizophrenia, compliance, adherence, antipsychotics, tolerability, and side effects was used to identify articles investigating the factors influencing compliance in schizophrenia. RESULTS: Many factors influence compliance, including those that affect patients' beliefs about their illness and the benefits of treatment (e.g., insight into illness, belief that medication can ameliorate symptoms), perceived costs of treatment (e.g., medication side effects), and barriers to treatment (e.g., ease of access to treatment, degree of family or social support). Medication side effects that are distressing to patients and linked to noncompliance include extrapyramidal side effects, neuroleptic dysphoria, akathisia, sexual dysfunction, and weight gain. Compliance can be improved by cognitive-behavioral therapies, such as compliance therapy, and other psychosocial interventions associated with improved social functioning and a lower risk of rehospitalization. Treatment adherence may also be improved by use of atypical antipsychotics with few perceived side effects. CONCLUSION: By considering the factors leading to noncompliance and adopting a comprehensive strategy for improving compliance, encompassing psychosocial intervention and optimum choice of medication, the management of schizophrenia could be greatly improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050100 · Cited by 7,974
Novick, D., Haro, J. M., Suarez, D., Perez, V., Dittmann, R. W., & Haddad, P. M. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.05.004 · Cited by 447
Kishimoto, T., Hagi, K., Kurokawa, S., Kane, J. M., & Correll, C. U. (2021) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00039-0 · Cited by 369
The role of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a critical appraisal
Brissos, S., Veguilla, M. R., Taylor, D., & Balanzá-Martinez, V. (2014) · Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/2045125314540297 · Cited by 297
Social support and three-year symptom and admission outcomes for first episode psychosis.
Norman, R. M. G., Malla, A. K., Manchanda, R., Harricharan, R., Takhar, J., & Northcott, S. (2005) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.05.006 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Perkins, D. O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2002-12-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1121-1128
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047151451
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Noncompliance in Patients With Schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v63n1206
- The paper
- Perkins, D. O. (2002). Predictors of Noncompliance in Patients With Schizophrenia. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v63n1206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.