A Clinical Perspective of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Into Adulthood
Abstract
Objective Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common psychiatric disorder that affects all age groups. Recent data on the clinical presentation, comorbidity, neurobiology, and treatment are reviewed. Method Using the search term ADHD, a selective PubMed review of the clinical literature was undertaken to evaluate recent data relevant to ADHD with attention to a life span perspective of the disorder. Results A growing literature indicates that ADHD is more persistent than previously thought and has a developmental variability in its presentation. The disorder impairs academic, social, and occupational functioning and is often associated with comorbidity, including cigarette smoking and substance abuse. Considerable evidence suggests that the disorder has a strong genetic component and a biological underpinning; the pathophysiology includes dysfunction in both noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems. Both psychosocial therapy and pharmacotherapy have been shown effective in the treatment of the disorder throughout the life span. The therapeutic effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of ADHD has been attributed to noradrenergic and/or dopaminergic effects. Conclusion ADHD is associated with impairment and comorbidity throughout the life span. Growing evidence suggests the importance of short- and long-term management of the disorder. While the long-term treatment of ADHD is expected to lessen the individual's impairment, the outcome for adults who…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects seen in the current study on weight and cardiovascular parameters were consistent with those previously reported for stimulants, including LDX, in adults.
“The effects seen in the current study on weight and cardiovascular parameters were consistent with those previously reported for stimulants, including LDX, in adults [7-9,18,37].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 274
- Authors
- Wilens, T. E., & Dodson, W.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Wilens, Timothy E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2004-10-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1301-1313
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016496786
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA14419, R01DA014419)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, comorbidities, substance abuse, cigarette smoking, genetic susceptibility, noradrenergic dysfunction, dopaminergic dysfunction, psychosocial interventions, pharmacotherapy, long-term treatment, lifespan development
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antidepressive Agents, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Smoking, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Conduct Disorder, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review