The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is There a Delay in the Antidepressant Effect? A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objectives It has long been thought that there is a delay of several weeks before a true antidepressant effect occurs, although this theory has increasingly come into question. The goals of this meta-analysis were to determine whether significant drug-placebo separation occurs during the first 2 weeks of treatment and to ascertain whether the timing of response to antidepressant medication and placebo is distinct. Data sources Seventy-six double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted between 1981 and 2000, included in a recently published meta-analysis that evaluated placebo response rates in depressed outpatients, were reviewed. In addition, each issue of 6 psychiatric journals from January 1992 through December 2001 was reviewed. Study selection Forty-seven studies that evaluated antidepressant medications with established efficacy, performed weekly or biweekly (every other week) evaluations, and presented the time course of improvement as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were included in our meta-analysis. Data synthesis The time course of improvement on active medication and placebo was nearly identical, as 60.2% and 61.6% of the improvement that occurred on active medication and placebo, respectively, took place during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Drug-placebo differences were not only present but were most pronounced during the first 2 weeks of treatment and diminished in a stepwise fashion thereafter. A series of subanalyses confirmed that th…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Factors contributing to rapid improvement may include medication effects (e.g., antidepressant, antipsychotic agents) (Agid et al., 2003; Posternak and Zimmerman, 2005), removal of alcohol and substances, and psychotherapy gains (Stiles et al., 2003).”
From Time in treatment: Examining mental illness trajectories across inpatient psychiatric treatment (2020) · cites this paper as Posternak and Zimmerman, 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–216 of 216
Wen, X., Han, B., Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Fengge, Y., Dou, F., Hao, Z., Li, H., & Hou, G. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122383
McLaughlin, P., & Cleare, A. (2020) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20170530-79
Rapid-Acting Antidepressant Effect of Ketamine and Its Clinical Application
Kim, Y., & Shin, C. (2018) · 신경정신의학 · doi:10.4306/jknpa.2018.57.2.108
[Unsatisfactory response: definition and involvement].
Haffen, E., & Poulet, E. (2016) · L'Encephale · doi:10.1016/s0013-7006(16)30017-3
Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Koerselman, F. (2012) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.002
Taylor, D., Paton, C., & Kerwin, R. (2009) · The “Troubled” Adolescent · doi:10.3109/9780203092835-5
Assessing the assessment of brain serotonin turnover.
Anderson, G. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.65.10.1223-a
Stress and Premature Ejaculation—A Response
Waldinger, M. (2007) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00591.x
Biancosino, B., Rocchi, D., Donà, S., Kotrotsiou, V., Marmai, L., & Grassi, L. (2007) · European psychiatry (Ed Española) · doi:10.1017/s1134066500004343
Current awareness in human psychopharmacology
(2005) · Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.637
Comorbid Psychiatric and Inflammatory Conditions in Dry Eye Disease
Ezuddin, N., Avila, S. A., & Galor, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15823-5_10
Bulut, S., Bulut, S., Ak, E., & Şengül, M. (2015) · Journal of Mood Disorders · doi:10.5455/jmood.20150427013807
“Yine bir metaanaliz çalışmasında ilaç etkinliğinin ilk iki haftada başladığı, ilaç ve plasebo etkinlik ayrımının ilk iki haftada yapılabileceği bildirilmektedir (6).”
BackgroundKatz, M. (2013) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00389-4_6
Developing a More Effective and More Efficient Clinical Trial Model
Katz, M. (2013) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00389-4_8
Elaboration of the New Theory of Depression and Conclusions
Katz, M. (2013) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00389-4_9
Metadata
- Authors
- Posternak, M. A., & Zimmerman, M.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- ORCID
- Zimmerman, Mark
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2005-02-15
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 148-158
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089202379
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- depression, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
- MeSH terms
- Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Placebo Effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review