Cited by 218Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Postwar Kosovar Adolescents Using Mind-Body Skills Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Gordon, James S., Staples, Julie K., Blyta, Afrim, Bytyqi, Murat, Wilson, Amy T.·2008·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To determine whether participation in a mind-body skills group program based on psychological self-care, mind-body techniques, and self-expression decreases symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Method Eighty-two adolescents meeting criteria for PTSD according to the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (which corresponds with 16 of the 17 diagnostic criteria for PTSD in DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to a 12-session mind-body group program or a wait-list control group. The program was conducted by high school teachers in consultation with psychiatrists and psychologists and included meditation, guided imagery, and breathing techniques; self-expression through words, drawings, and movement; autogenic training and biofeedback; and genograms. Changes in PTSD symptoms were measured using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. The study was conducted from September 2004 to May 2005 by The Center for Mind-Body Medicine at a high school in the Suhareka region of Kosovo. Results Students in the immediate intervention group had significantly lower PTSD symptom scores following the intervention than those in the wait-list control group (F = 29.8, df = 1,76; p Conclusions Mind-body skills groups can reduce PTSD symptoms in war-traumatized high school students and can be effectively led by trained and supervised schoolteachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v69n0915

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 218

Authors
Gordon, J. S., Staples, J. K., Blyta, A., Bytyqi, M., & Wilson, A. T.
Affiliations
The Center for Mind-Body Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2008-09-30
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
1469-1476
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073505653
Cited by
218
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, adolescents, war trauma, group intervention, meditation, guided imagery, autogenic training, biofeedback, self-expression, genogram, school-based intervention, teacher-led intervention, psychological self-care
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Art Therapy, Autogenic Training, Biofeedback, Psychology, Breathing Exercises, Combined Modality Therapy, Faculty, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Self Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Warfare, Yugoslavia, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Meditation, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review