Cited by 19Treatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Long-term Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Aripiprazole for Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Seshadri, Ashok, Wermers, Michaela L., Habermann, Timothy J., Singh, Balwinder·2021·The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders

Abstract

Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as an augmentation strategy for major depressive disorder (MDD). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Embase databases were systematically searched for clinical studies of adult patients with MDD on long-term aripiprazole augmentation. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Long-term follow-up was defined as ≥ 6 months. Primary outcome was remission from depression. Secondary outcome was incidence of adverse effects. Results: Four open-label studies were included in this review. Random effects meta-analysis of 3 studies (n = 2,117) revealed a weighted average remission proportion of 0.33 (0.16-0.51), showing trend of improved response with duration of treatment. Three studies (n = 2,231) provided adverse effects data. Medically significant weight gain (25%-28% participants) was higher in studies with patients receiving doses ≥ 5 mg and lower (3.5%) in a study using doses Conclusions: Aripiprazole augmentation may be an effective long-term strategy for treatment of refractory MDD. Lower maintenance doses (2-5 mg) of aripiprazole may be effective and have fewer side effects compared to larger doses (> 5 mg-10 mg).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/pcc.20r02799

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study data support current pharmacological augmentation recommendations from several depression treatment guidelines that recommend atypical antipsychotics as first-line agents, specifically aripiprazole and quetiapine.

    “Our data support current pharmacological augmentation recommendations from several treatment guidelines for depression which recommend the use of AAs as first line agents, specifically the use of aripiprazole and quetiapine (Kennedy et al., 2016; NICE, 2010; Seshadri et al., 2021).”
  • Aripiprazole as an augmentation agent at a mean dose of 10.68 ± 3.1 mg/day showed significant benefit and had low discontinuation rates.

    “Aripiprazole as an augmentation agent (mean dose,10.68 ± 3.1 mg/day) showed significant benefit and had low discontinuation rates, which aligns with previous studies (Seshadri et al., 2021; Strawbridge et al., 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seshadri, A., Wermers, M. L., Habermann, T. J., & Singh, B.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Seshadri, Ashok
Venue
The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders
Published
2021-06-24
Volume
23
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2155-7772 (ISSN-L)
  • 2155-7780
OpenAlex
W3173375176
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
aripiprazole, major depressive disorder, antidepressant augmentation, long-term efficacy, tolerability, remission, weight gain, akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, insomnia, sleepiness, fatigue, maintenance dose, treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Tardive Dyskinesia, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review