Cited by 23Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service InteractionsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Awareness of using chatbots and factors influencing usage intention among nursing students in South Korea: a descriptive study

Open access
Kang, So Ra, Kim, Shin-Jeong, Kang, Kyung-Ah·2023·Child Health Nursing Research

Abstract

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a profound impact on humanity; in particular, chatbots have been designed for interactivity and applied to many aspects of daily life. Chatbots are also regarded as an innovative modality in nursing education. This study aimed to identify nursing students' awareness of using chatbots and factors influencing their usage intention.Methods: This study, which employed a descriptive design using a self-reported questionnaire, was conducted at three university nursing schools located in Seoul, South Korea. The participants were 289 junior and senior nursing students. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires, both online via a Naver Form and offline.Results: The total mean score of awareness of using chatbots was 3.49±0.61 points out of 5. The mean scores of the four dimensions of awareness of using chatbots were 3.37±0.60 for perceived value, 3.66±0.73 for perceived usefulness, 3.83±0.73 for perceived ease of use, and 3.36±0.87 for intention to use. Significant differences were observed in awareness of using chatbots according to satisfaction with nursing (p<.001), effectiveness of using various methods for nursing education (p<.001), and interest in chatbots (p<.001). The correlations among the four dimensions ranged from .52 to .80. In a hierarchical regression analysis, perceived value (β=.45) accounted for 60.2% of variance in intention to use.Conclusion: The results suggest that chatbots have the potential to be used in nursing education. Further research is needed to clarify the effectiveness of using chatbots in nursing education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4094/chnr.2023.29.4.290

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI has the potential to significantly enhance science education.

    “underscoring its potential to significantly enhance science education.28”

    From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Learning on Nursing Students' Ethical Decision-making and Clinical Reasoning in Pediatric Care (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says AI can enhance learning effectiveness and engagement across disciplines, supporting the general claim of educational potential. The paper focuses on nursing education, however, and does not specifically establish that AI could significantly enhance science education; science education appears only in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Murray TA Nursing education: our iceberg is melting Journal of Nursing Education 2018 57 10 575 576 10.3928/01484834-20180921-01 30277540 · DOI
  2. [2]Chang CY Hwang GJ Gau ML Promoting students' learning achievement and self-efficacy: a mobile chatbot approach for nursing training British Journal of Educational Technology 2022 53 1 171 188 10.1111/bjet.13158 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Kim M Lee J Analysis of interaction in cooperative learning by academic achievement in a middle school English class Journal of Educational Technology 2019 35 1 1 35 10.17232/KSET.35.1.001 · DOI
  4. [4]Kim SY Kim JR Affective effects of English digital textbook lessons using AI chatbots Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2021 21 10 37 49
  5. [7]Chang J Park J Park J An analysis on the trends of education research related to ‘artificial intelligence chatbot' in Korea: focusing on implications for use in science education Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2021 21 13 729 743
  6. [9]Min Y Ahn J Kim S Structural relationship analysis between the intention to use educational chatbots and influential factors based on technology acceptance model Journal of Educational Information and Media 2020 26 4 799 825 10.15833/KAFEIAM.26.4.799 · DOI
  7. [12]Chu SY Kang S Yoo SC The influences of perceived value of AI medical counseling chatbot service on the use intention: focused on the usage purpose of chatbot counseling of obstetrics and gynecology Health Service Management Review 2021 15 3 41 59 10.18014/hsmr.2021.15.3.41 · DOI
  8. [15]Gause G Mokgaola IO Rakhudu MA Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: an integrative review Curationis 2022 45 1 e1 e9 10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2261 PMC9257720 35792609 · DOI
  9. [17]Kang KA Kim SJ Kang SR Elementary school students' awareness of the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in violence prevention education in South Korea: a descriptive study Child Health Nursing Research 2022 28 4 291 298 10.4094/chnr.2022.28.4.291 36379605 PMC9672520 · DOI
  10. [18]Mo Y A developmental study on a chatbot for digital storytelling [master's thesis] Seoul Seoul National University 2020 1 150
  11. [19]Tatnall A Encyclopedia of education and information technologies Springer 2020 p. 202
  12. [20]Yin J Goh TT Yang B Xiaobin Y Conversation technology with micro-learning: the impact of chatbot-based learning on students' learning motivation and performance Journal of Educational Computing Research 2021 59 1 154 177 10.1177/0735633120952067 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [21]Huang YT, Yang JC, Wu YC. The development and evaluation of English dialogue companion system. Paper presented at: the 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies; 2008 Jul 1-5; Santander, Spain. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, 2008. p. 864-868
  14. [22]Lee DH Park SI A developmental plan for an English conversation learning chatbot through the application of elementary school English textbooks Primary English Education 2019 25 4 79 100 10.25231/pee.2019.25.4.79 · DOI
  15. [25]Mardiana S Tjakraatmadja JH Aprianingsih A DeLone-McLean information system success model revisited: the separation of intention to use-use and the integration of technology acceptance models International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 2015 5 Special Issue 172 182
  16. [26]Oh JH A study on factors affecting the intention to use the metaverse by applying the extended technology acceptance model (ETAM): focused on the virtual world metaverse Journal of the Korea Contents Association 2021 21 10 204 216 10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.10.204 · DOI
  17. [28]Park YY Influence factors of use intention of chatbot by applying components of experience-based communication and contextbased communication Journal of the Korea Entertainment Industry Association 2020 14 3 149 162 10.21184/jkeia.2020.4.14.3.149 · DOI
  18. [29]Cheng SF [Transformation in nursing education: development and implementation of diverse innovative teaching] Journal of Nursing 2021 68 6 4 5 Chinese. 10.6224/JN.202112_68(6).01 34839484 · DOI

Authors
Kang, S. R., Kim, S.-J., & Kang, K.-A.
Affiliations
  • Wonkwang University (KR)
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • Sahmyook University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Shin-Jeong
Venue
Child Health Nursing Research
Published
2023-10-31
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
290-299
ISSN
  • 2287-9110 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-9129
OpenAlex
W4388139279
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Health Nursing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hallym University (HRF-202301-013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
chatbots, nursing students, intention to use, technology acceptance, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived value, nursing education, artificial intelligence in education, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review