Cited by 13Extraction and Separation ProcessesRadioactive element chemistry and processingMining Techniques and Economics

A preliminary techno-economic assessment of lithium extraction from flowback and produced water from unconventional shale and tight hydrocarbon operations in Western Canada

Leece, A, Jiang, C·2023

Abstract

In the path towards decarbonization, rechargeable lithium-ion batteries are critical for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles and renewable energy storage systems. To meet the growing demand for this mineral, various sources of lithium are being explored. This study evaluated the technical and economic feasibility of direct lithium extraction (DLE) from flowback and produced waters (FPW) of the Duvernay shale reservoir development near Fox Creek, Alberta and the Montney tight reservoir development in Northeast British Columbia using ion-exchange sorbents. Results indicate that lithium extraction from FPW using DLE technology is a viable option, with fluid pH, temperature, total suspended solids, and organic carbon affecting extraction efficiencies. In the assessment of Duvernay-based FPW fluids processed at a selected centralized facility, approximately 93 tonnes of lithium carbonate, or 105 tonnes of lithium hydroxide monohydrate could be produced annually, based on an average lithium content of 45.1 mg/L and a capacity of approximately 475,000 m3 per year. A discounted cash flow analysis determined the after-tax and royalty internal rate of return of 22% in the production of lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), and 38% in the production of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH·H2O) from the Duvernay development area. Comparatively, in the assessment of Montney brine fluids processed at a modelled centralized facility, approximately 117 tonnes of lithium carbonate or 134 tonnes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4095/331879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brine composition and parameters vary significantly between extraction sites, requiring adaptation of DLE techniques to specific brine conditions and research and testing to ensure process efficacy.

    “The complexity of brine compositions and parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, organic carbon, solid suspended solids, ion concentrations, and Na/Li and Mg/Li ratios), which vary significantly between extraction sites, requires adaptation of DLE techniques to specific brine conditions, and research and testing to ensure process efficacy [52,64,65].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leece, A., & Jiang, C.
Affiliations
Natural Resources Canada (CA)
Published
2023
OpenAlex
W4379055869
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Mining Techniques and Economics
Keywords
direct lithium extraction, shale oil and gas, Duvernay shale, ion-exchange sorbents, lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide monohydrate, battery-grade lithium, techno-economic analysis, discounted cash flow, internal rate of return, lithium supply chain, Western Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review