The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size
Open accessAbstract
The previous articles of the Statistical Round in the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology posed a strong enquiry on the issue of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST). P values lie at the core of NHST and are used to classify all treatments into two groups: "has a significant effect" or "does not have a significant effect." NHST is frequently criticized for its misinterpretation of relationships and limitations in assessing practical importance. It has now provoked criticism for its limited use in merely separating treatments that "have a significant effect" from others that do not. Effect sizes and CIs expand the approach to statistical thinking. These attractive estimates facilitate authors and readers to discriminate between a multitude of treatment effects. Through this article, I have illustrated the concept and estimating principles of effect sizes and CIs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467
Thompson, B. (2002) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x · Cited by 398
Cited by
What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test?
Lee, S., & Lee, D. K. (2018) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00242 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationArntz, F., Markov, A., Behm, D. G., Behrens, M., Negra, Y., Nakamura, M., Moran, J., & Chaabene, H. (2023) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01806-9 · Cited by 82
Dolenc, K., & Brumen, M. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100285 · Cited by 25
Thew, G. R., Powell, C. L., Kwok, A. P., Lissillour Chan, M. H., Wild, J., Warnock-Parkes, E., Leung, P. W., & Clark, D. M. (2019) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/13446 · Cited by 24
Exploring the behavioral and cognitive phenotype of KBG syndrome
van Dongen, L. C. M., Wingbermühle, E., van der Veld, W. M., Vermeulen, K., Bos‐Roubos, A. G., Ockeloen, C. W., Kleefstra, T., & Egger, J. I. M. (2019) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12553 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D. K.
- Venue
- Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 555
- ISSN
- 0302-5780 (ISSN-L)
- 2005-6419
- 2005-7563
- OpenAlex
- W2547157569
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555
- The paper
- Lee, D. K. (2016). Alternatives to P value: confidence interval and effect size. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
