Different voices on decolonising of the curriculum
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using indigenous knowledge as a vehicle to decolonise the curriculum holds affordances for rediscovery and recovery.
“Using indigenous knowledge as a vehicle to decolonise the curriculum, holds affordances for rediscovery and recovery, a process that Le Grange (2019, 29) describes as “whereby colonised peoples rediscover and recover their own history, culture, language and identity”.”
From Insights provided into the decolonisation of the science curriculum, and teaching and learning of indigenous knowledge, using Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (2021) · cites this paper as Le Grange (2019, 29)
The indexed copy contains a book synopsis and chapter list, but no text from Le Grange’s chapter or page 29. Searches for the quoted definition and for rediscovery and recovery in relation to indigenous knowledge found no passage that verifies the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Beer, J. J., & Kriek, J. (2021) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/35-6-4217 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stellenbosch University, & Le Grange, L.
- Venue
- NWU Self-Directed Learning Series
- Publisher
- AOSIS
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 25-47
- ISSN
- 2707-1537
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
