The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 95 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: ’n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief
Open accessAbstract
The placing of Genesis 38 within the Joseph narrative: A literary sociological perspectiveA review of research on Gen 38 defines it as a literary riddle. The reasoning of this passage’s positioning and function within the Joseph narrative leads to a maze of different viewpoints. This article systematizes research on Gen 38 into three basic viewpoints: [1] Gen 38 forms an intrinsic part of the Joseph narrative; [2] Gen 38 is an independent literary unit; [3] Gen 38 is dialectically related to the Joseph narrative. Gen 38 reflects a polemical Southern perspective of the Kingdom of Judah against a Northern perspective of the Kingdom of Israel. This viewpoint links up with the argument that Gen 38 should be seen as dialectically related to the Joseph narrative.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This article systematizes existing research on Genesis 38 into three positions on its placement in the Joseph narrative — intrinsic part, independent unit, or dialectically related — and argues for the third: Gen 38 is a polemical Southern (Judean) counter-narrative against the Northern (Israelite) perspective of the Joseph story. Read together with Gen 49, it frames the Joseph narrative as an *inclusio* that relativizes Joseph's divinely destined dominance in favour of Judah's future rule.
Key findings
- Research on Gen 38 falls into three basic viewpoints: (1) it is intrinsically part of the Joseph narrative (Alter, Mathewson, Wildavsky); (2) it is a fully independent narrative (Redford, Von Rad, Westermann, Brueggemann, Soggin); (3) it stands in a dialectical relation to the Joseph narrative (Van Selms, Longacre, Garrett, Van Seters, Blum, Rendsburg, Carr, Ho). The authors adopt position 3.
- Gen 38 contains encoded links to the David story: Adullam (Gen 38:1) is also David's refuge (1 Sam 22:1), about 16 km northwest of Hebron; the name Ḥirah parallels Hiram; Bat-Sua evokes Bathsheba (1 Chron 3:5); the phrase "she sent to say" occurs six times in Gen 38 and six times in the David story; both Judah and David are "embarrassed into admitting their guilt" (Rendsburg 1986:442).
- The Joseph narrative carries Northern motifs (Jacob/Israel traditions, Pniël, Bethel, Shechem, Gen 48's blessing of Ephraim and Manasseh), while Gen 38 and Gen 49:8-12 place the emphasis on the Southern kingdom; in Gen 49, of 25 verses, five are devoted to Judah and five to Joseph (Longacre 1989:53 gives Joseph 40% of the pericope).
- Gen 38 and Gen 49:1b-28 function as an *inclusio* that "redirect the surrounding Joseph story" (Carr 1996:249): Joseph's dominance belongs to a narrative past, Judah's to a narrative future.
Methods
- A literary-sociological study, framed by the premises that literature's truth is polyvalent and that literary formation is a dynamic discourse of master-narratives and counter-narratives (Breytenbach 1997).
- The article reviews and systematizes existing exegetical scholarship on Gen 38 into the three positions above, distinguishing diachronic from synchronic approaches.
- It then analyses textual motifs in Gen 38 and Gen 37-50 — locality elements, personal names, relational/theological motifs, chronology — and their intertextual links with the David narrative and with Northern/Southern royal theology (Sion theology).
Limitations
- The authors state that the scope of the study does not allow a detailed investigation of the historical horizons of origin (time and place) of the literary entities discussed, and they recommend this as a topic for further study.
- They flag that an exclusively literary-narratological approach risks anachronistic, ethnocentric readings of the text (citing Brink 1987; Elliott 1993), and that Alter's approach imposes limits on what it can see.
- The authors themselves judge some proposed associations as strained — Rendsburg's last associations "come across as somewhat forced" — and note that Ho's associative explanation "leaves room for ambiguity"; their own Southern-counter-narrative reading is presented as a hypothesis.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
62 Sources not found · 47 Own interpretation · 33 No basis given · 8 Not checked yet · 1 Own result
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ook Wildavsky slaag nie daarin om die teologisering in die Juda-en Josefverhale raak te sien nie.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die hoofsaaklik sinchroniese benadering van Alter, Mathewson en Wildavsky blyk duidelik uit hulle literêre benadering tot die teks as”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit is vanuit die bestudeerde materiaal opmerklik dat die eerste standpunt aansienlik minder aanhang geniet.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ook die uitdrukking (in chiastiese vorm) kom slegs in D A Viljoen & A P B Breytenbach HTS 58(4) 2002 1811 hierdie twee stories voor.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Dit word gedoen deur die term”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 49:8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 42:6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 44:14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hierdie dinamiek tree eerstens na vore in die parallel tussen Gen 38:25a en 2 Samuel 11:5, spesifiek ten opsigte van woordspeling:”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:25a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2 Samuel 11:5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Gegewe die definisie van Elliott van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Elliott
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Die motief van Juda se broers wat deur hulle optrede van die eersgeboortereg gediskwalifiseer is sodat Juda se toekomstige heersersposisie in die fokus geplaas word (Gen 49:3-7), vind weerklank in die motief van Juda se seuns en die uiteindelike eersgeboortereg van Peres (Gen 38).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 49:3-7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 38
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Tamar het immers teruggekeer na haar vader se huis nadat sy Juda by die poort van Enajim ontmoet het (Gen 38:19).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Jerusalem is beskou as die enigste ware heiligdom van Jahwe wat gekanoniseer is deur alle ander heiligdomme in die staat Juda te sluit (2 Kon 18:1-4) as deel van die proses om konkurrente uit te skakel.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 2 Kon 18:1-4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 103
- It may state two separate claims as one. 58
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Josef word nooit in die narratief negatief beoordeel oor sy Egiptiese verbande nie; dit vorm inteendeel die konteks waarbinne God volgens die verhaal Josef se prominensie bo sy broers bevestig en sy voorsienigheid laat geld.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Juda se Kanaänitiese verbande beoordeel hy egter positief.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Redford benader die Josefnarratief sowel diachronies as sinchronies, maar sy behandeling van Gen 38 geskied hoofsaaklik op”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ook Wildavsky ontsnap nie aan”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genoemde drie eksegete ken aan Gen 38 betekenis toe slegs in samehang met die Josefnarratief.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This article systematizes research on Gen 38 into three basic viewpoints: [1] Gen 38 forms an intrinsic part of the Joseph narrative; [2] Gen 38 is an independent literary unit; [3] Gen 38 is dialectically related to the Joseph narrative.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mathewson se eenduidige teologie van Gen ontken konteks as betekeniskonstituerende element by die lees van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1162
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Die werke van Blum (1984:204-270), Rendsburg (1986:438-446), Carr (1996:248-310) en Ho (1999:514-529) verteenwoordig”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Blum 1984:204-270
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Rendsburg 1986:438-446
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:248-310
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alter en Mathewson relativeer die verhaal van Juda en Tamar tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reasoning of this passage's positioning and function within the Joseph narrative leads to a maze of different viewpoints.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > Abstract
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wat die tweede standpunt betref, ken die eksegete betekenis aan die Juda-Tamarverhaal slegs onafhanklik van die Josefnarratief toe.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dit is opvallend genoeg slegs die eindkonsonant van die name wat verskil.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hy sonder Gen 38 af op grond van die plot van die Josefnarratief waarby Gen 38 inhoudelik geen inskakeling het nie.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sy etiese optrede en administratiewe wysheid word om begryplike redes sterk op die voorgrond gestel.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As karakter is Benjamin passief en stilswyend in die verhaal.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Juda word in die seënspreuk absoluut prominent voorgestel en bo Josef verhef as die regmatige heerser.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Josef voorsien slegs aan hulle; in barmhartigheid versorg hy sy mense.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit is van belang dat Gen 38 direk na die aanvang van die Josefvertelling ingevoeg word, terwyl Gen 49 net voor die slot daarvan te berde gebring word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Die frase kom ses keer voor in Gen 38, en word ook in die Dawidverhaal ses keer gebruik.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die kleedmotief en allegoriese droom in Gen 37 staan in noue relasie tot mekaar.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Josef, die mindere (skynbaar onderworpe) Josef, die meerdere Juda, die meerdere (skynbaar oorwinnaar) Juda, die mindere”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In die Josefvertelling is Benjamin Josef se bloedbroer.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So ontstaan meesternarratiewe wat voorgee om universele waarhede bloot te lê met as doel marginalisering van opposisiegroepe en die dominering van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die literatuur van die Ou Testament het immers nie in”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit is ook hier waar Dawid sy aanhangers versamel.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Blum (1984:227), Rendsburg (1986:438-446), Carr (1996:249) en Ho (1999:514-529) het in hulle studie van Gen 38 elemente gevind wat hulle as geenkodeerde inligting beskou na die Dawidsgeskiedenis.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Blum (1984:227)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Rendsburg (1986:438-446)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Carr (1996:249)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die teks kommunikeer dus”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Die eerste eenvoudige verwysing is na Juda se wegtrek na Adullam (Gen 38:1).Adullam is ook die plek waarheen Dawid gevlug het tydens sy stryd met Saul (1 Sam 22:1).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1 Sam 22:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Die literatuursosiologie wys daarop dat literatuur meerduidig is ten opsigte van rolspelers.Nie net die implisiete skrywer en leser nie, maar ook die kritici, uitgewers, vertalers, samestellers, verspreiders en sensors van literatuur werk medebepalend in op die waarheidsverstaan van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Viljoen 1992:275
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1168
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gen 38 reflects a polemical Southern perspective of the Kingdom of Judah against a Northern perspective of the Kingdom of Israel.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > Abstract
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah, through their literature, reflect a discourse that is often polemical, a discourse that also houses marginalizing and legitimating motives.
In the paper
“Rendsburg (1986:442) vind ook ooreenkomste in die persone van Juda en Dawid.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rendsburg (1986:442)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Carr (1996:309-310) het oortuigend uitgewys dat”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:309-310
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“n Totaal objektiewe optekening van gebeure is dus nie moontlik nie, net so min as wat”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Die vertolking van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1164-1165
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Grondliggend daaraan is”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 3. GENESIS 38: IN OF UIT?
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This viewpoint links up with the argument that Gen 38 should be seen as dialectically related to the Joseph narrative.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > Abstract
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dit is in die eie aard van die narratiewe literatuur om”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Deist 1984:146
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“n Eerste nalees van eksegetiese studies oor die verhaal van Juda en Tamar laat onwillekeurig die indruk dat die plasing van Gen 38”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 1. 'N BRANDENDE VRAAGSTUK
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mathewson (1989:373)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In die diskoers wat so ontstaan, vind belangegroepe dit nodig om hulle identiteit te bepaal deur afgrensing van beskouinge wat in hulle verstaan nie ooreenstem met hulle eie waardesisteem nie.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Brueggemann (1989:17) konstateer ten regte dat waarheid”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Brueggemann 1989:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Mathewson (kyk 1989:375) werk met”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mathewson 1989:375
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Tereg merk hy dan ook op dat hierdie hoofstuk relatief min as preekteks gekies word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 1. 'N BRANDENDE VRAAGSTUK
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mathewson (1989:373)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Literatuurversamelings verkry kanonieke status wanneer dit ten doel het om”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1169
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A review of research on Gen 38 defines it as a literary riddle.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Gen 38 has generated more frustration than enthusiasm among its interpreters.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 1. 'N BRANDENDE VRAAGSTUK
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mathewson (1989:373)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“n Ontkenning van hierdie polivalente karakter lei tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Rendsburg (1986:442) maak baie van die eienaam (Gen 38:1), Kanaänitiese vriend van Juda.Hy vind daarin ooreenstemming met die koning van Tirus, , wat Dawid goedgesind was (2 Sam 5:11).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rendsburg (1986:442)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2 Sam 5:11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Beide was in hulle jongelingsjare skaapwagters (Gen 37:2 en 12; 1 Sam 16:11) wat later eienaars geword het met ander wat hulle skape oppas.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 37:2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1 Sam 16:11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“n Kanon is geïnstitusionaliseerde literatuur wat”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Venter 1987:7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sy denke is teenstrydig van aard en sy resultate geforseerd omdat hy”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Ook die kommentare van Brueggemann, Von Rad en Westermann benader Gen 38 sinchronies en sonder dit op grond van teksinterne getuienis af.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Brueggemann
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Von Rad
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Westermann
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Die sosiaal-wetenskaplike kritiek sluit hierby aan met die insig dat sodanige konsepte of idees wat grondliggend aan die ontstaan van literatuur lê, sosiologies-perspektiwies gekondisioneer is deur psigologiese, kulturele en sosiologiese faktore.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Elliott 1993:36-37
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Dit geld ook die leser as interpreteerder wat vanuit”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Elliott 1993:36-37
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dawid is die pater familias in 2 Samuel terwyl Juda dieselfde rol vervul in Gen 38.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indien Juda en Josef as kollektiewe naamwoorde verstaan word wat tradisies van onderskeidelik die suidelike en noordelike ryke verteenwoordig, kom”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah, through their literature, reflect a discourse that is often polemical, a discourse that also houses marginalizing and legitimating motives.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hierdie studie vind sigself gemaklik tuis met die standpunt dat Gen 38”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Blum 1984:204-270
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Rendsburg 1986:438-446
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:248-310
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Literatuur in die Ou Testament reflekteer teologisering te HTS 58(4) 2002 midde van hierdie kontekste, teologisering wat uiteraard tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > HTS 58(4) 2002
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hoe die posisie van Gen 38 in die Josefverhaal verstaan word, bepaal tot 'n groot mate die funksie wat aan die verhaal toegeken word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 3. GENESIS 38: IN OF UIT?
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Geskiedenis as vertelling beteken dan die begronding van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1163
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Adullam is ongeveer 16 kilometer noordwes van Hebron (Van Selms 1986:190) waar Dawid as koning erken is (2 Sam 2:1-7; 5:1-5).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Van Selms 1986:190
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2 Sam 2:1-7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 5:1-5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Weerstand teen die totaliserende en marginaliserende aard van so”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Alle menslike bewussyn is onderworpe aan ideologies gekleurde karaktertrekke: teologiese, kulturele en sosiale formuleringe van mense druk iets uit van hulle selfverstaan en belange wat uiteraard ook aan hulle literatuur as produk van hierdie denke die karakter verleen van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.1 Die waarheidskarakter van literatuur is polivalent van aard
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Viljoen 1992:275
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Elliott 1993:10, 52
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“n Nuwe meesternarratief kan ontstaan waar kontranarratiewe kombineer, veral waar historiese gebeure”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 2.2 Literatuurvorming is 'n dinamiese deurlopende diskoers
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Breytenbach 1997:1165-1169
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Die koning van Israel moet hierdie barmhartigheid en genade in sy heerserskap uitleef deur nooit sy eie mense te verkneg soos wat hulle in Egipte verkneg was nie (Deut 17:14-20).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Deut 17:14-20
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“God se handelinge word in sisteemdenke tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Van belang vir hierdie studie is egter die feit dat hierdie dialektiese diskoers in die Kanon opgeneem is en”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Sowel Juda as Dawid kom aanvanklik nie in die oopte na hulle seksuele dade nie.Juda volg die weg van stilswye (Gen 38:23), maar Dawid probeer met bedrog en uiteindelik moord sy skuld toesmeer (2 Sam 11).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:23
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2 Sam 11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die kanonisering van die dialektiese spanning tussen die Juda-Tamarverhaal en die Josefverhaal breek sisteemdenke af.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Tematies is die assosiasie gesetel in die misbruik van beide vroue: Tamar van Gen 38 word deur haar skoonpa misken in haar reg as weduwee; Tamar in die Dawidverhaal word deur haar stiefbroer seksueel misbruik en daarna misken (2 Sam 13).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 2 Sam 13
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die literêr-sosiologiese dinamiek wat hierdie studie uitgewys het, het as definitiewe onderbou die beëindiging van die personale unie tussen die noordelike en suidelike ryke.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dieselfde gebeur met die kultusheiligdom by Sigem (vgl Gen 33:20).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 33:20
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deur die suidelike verwerking van die Josefnarratief gee die redaktor subtiel”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die getuienis vir”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Die parallel deur Carr (1996:275) uitgewys funksioneer dus sterk polemies en legitimerend.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:275
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Josef se uitverkiesing as die jongste (en in terme van die verhaal as die een van wie dit die minste verwag is) dui op Jahwe se onkonvensionele en dikwels verrassende werking in die geskiedenis soos dit ook in die uittogtradisie na vore tree.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In Carr (1996:249) se woorde: Whereas the context develops a narrative world where Joseph”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:249
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit handel oor meer as net watter teologiese waarheid deur die verhaal verkondig word; dit gaan ten diepste ook oor wie se teologiese waarheid verteenwoordig word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wat egter van belang is, is die dinamiek wat in beide verhale loskom wanneer dit bekend word dat die vroue swanger is met onderskeidelik Juda en Dawid se kinders.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Die moderne mens in die Westerse wêreld benader die teks met westerse idees, beginsels en vooropstellinge wat dikwels lei tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Elliott 1993:10-11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die stam Benjamin was geleë op die grens tussen die suide en noorde en was dikwels die brandpunt van twiste tussen die twee politieke entiteite.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Die broers buig voor Josef volgens hierdie drome.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 37:6-9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In die noordelike teologie is die hede altyd verstaan in die lig van die verlede (vgl Deist & Du Plessis 1981:62-65).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Deist & Du Plessis 1981:62-65
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit het na die beëindiging van die personale unie tussen Israel en Juda geskied (aanvanklik het die aanspraak dat Jerusalem die woonplek van Jahwe is, deel gevorm van die poging om dit as simbool van eenheid te gebruik ter bevordering van die personale unie Israel-Juda).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wat dikwels na”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Jahwe wys self die koning aan in kontras met die suide se beginsel dat die voortbestaan van die Dawiddinastie ewig gewaarborg is op grond van die belofte van Jahwe (vgl die Sionsteologie).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sionsteologie
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Die betekenis van die werkwoord word deur Holladay (1971:97) geïntensifiseer as diep neerbuig en onderdanigheid betoon.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Holladay (1971:97)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Veral Rendsburg en Ho wys daarop dat 1 Kronieke 3:5 na Batseba onder die naam Bat-Sua verwys.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2 Suidelike motiewe en sentimente in Genesis 38
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1 Kronieke 3:5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Josef word as die ideale model daarvan voorgestel: waar hy die Egiptenare tot ondergeskiktes relativeer (Gen 47:13-26), weier hy om sy broers tot slawe te maak, selfs al bied hulle dit aan (Gen 44:33; 50:18).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 47:13-26
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 44:33
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 50:18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die stam Benjamin hoort dus volgens die vertelling by die noorde.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In die konteks van die noordelike teologie vervul Egipte as lokaliteitsmotief nie maar slegs”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tyd en omstandighede het na die twee ballingskappe”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit is Josef se goddelike bestemming om te heers.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die Sionsteologie as sisteem het dit byvoorbeeld as”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The claims of the surrounding narrative for Joseph are left in place, but they are overcome by being relegated to a narrative past: Joseph was dominant, but in the future Judah will be the one who ends up on top (Gen 49:8, 10).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 49:8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Gen 49:10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die narratief legitimeer die identiteit en bestaansreg van die noorde en verteenwoordig dus”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gen 38 en 49 dien as die leidrade dat die verhaal anders gelees moet word: die aansprake van die noordelike ryk behoort tot”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dit skep dan 'n dialektiese spanning tussen die aansprake van belangegroepe.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die teologisering wat in die dialektiese diskoers van Gen 37-50 na vore tree, is in albei gevalle voorbeelde van sisteemdenke wat die waarheid enkelvoudig verstaan het, gekondisioneer deur”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In die antieke wêreld van die patriarge het totaal ander etiese norme gegeld -etiese norme wat gemeenskapsbepaald was.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Onvermydelik is die residensie van Dawid op die Sionsberg (Jerusalem) by hierdie opvatting betrek, sodat Jerusalem ook die stad van Jahwe geword het wat Hy self gekies het as woonplek (1 Kon 8:12-21; Jes 8:18; Ps 9:12; 74:2).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites 1 Kon 8:12-21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Jes 8:18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Ps 9:12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die enigste ooreenkoms is dat twee vroue se regte beskerm word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Juda se genealogie en die eersgeboortereg wat oorloop na Peres simboliseer Jahwe se legitimering van Dawid se heerskappy ten spyte van die feit dat interne spanning in die Koninkryk (vgl interne spanning in die huis van Juda as motief in Gen 38) dié belofte telkens bedreig.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So word”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In beide se teologiese en ideologiese perspektiewe word aanspraak gemaak op absolute, universele waarhede wat dien as strategieë van beheer ter wille van die versterking van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Juda dien weer as simbool van die staat Juda se teologiese verstaan van die koningskap vanuit die belofte aan Dawid van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Literêr-sosiologies beskou is die karakter Josef meer as net die individu of die stam Josef.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Josef dien as simbool van die staat Israel se teologiese verstaan van die koningskap wat in wese teokraties van aard is met die veronderstelling dat nie”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Carr (1996:279-280) maak ook die suggestie dat Benjamin as karakter in die Josefnarratief”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:279-280
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beide motiewe het met mag, prominente status en onderwerping te doen.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“n Man het owerspel gepleeg alleenlik met die vrou van”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Preuss 1996:108
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Poligamie byvoorbeeld was”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Preuss 1996:104
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Keeling 1994:43-46
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In die verloop van die geskiedenis is albei ryke se teologisering krities bevraagteken deur hulle ondergangdie stabiele fondament van hulle ewig geldende waarhede het verbrokkel.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Daarmee word die koningskap van die noorde gelegitimeer en die suide se koningskapsbeginsel gerelativeer; alle besware teen die regmatige koningskap van die noorde word dus besweer.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Die kollektiewe belang van die gemeenskap is op die voorgrond gestel; stamverwantskap het bepaal wat eties korrek was (vgl Lev 18-20).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lev 18-20
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die Josefnarratief word literêr reeds aan die begin van die vertelling kontekstueel opgeneem in die Jakobkomposisie deur middel van die -formule.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“God se soewereiniteit en absolute almag word daardeur bevestig.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Die logika van die narratief word dus in die literatuur van die Ou Testament nie altyd chronologies bepaal nie, maar kan ook ideologies-sosiologies bepaal word.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Soos De Moor (2000:193) dit stel:”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites De Moor 2000:193
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Die oproep tot gedesentraliseerde vorms van heerskappy en broederlike solidariteit word dan die retoriese funksie van die Josefnarratief (Carr 1996:276-277).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Carr 1996:276-277
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Volgens Schmidt (1980:88) is hierdie uitdrukking stilisties verbonde aan die Deuteronomis wat dit veral gebruik ten opsigte van die Israelitiese en Judese konings (vgl Ho 1999:518-519).”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schmidt (1980:88)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Ho 1999:518-519
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Die uitdrukking in Gen 38:7 en 10 word in 1 Kronieke 2:3 binne die konteks van die konings gebruik, asook in 1 Samuel 15:19 en ietwat aangepas in 1 Samuel 12:17.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 4.2.1.3 Relasionele motiewe
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gen 38:7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1 Kronieke 2:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Breytenbach (2000:383-386) beklemtoon dat die waarheid van die Skrif nie enkelvoudig is nie, maar gebonde aan plek en tyd.”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Breytenbach 2000:383-386 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not checked yet
The authors state this as an assumption.
The northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah, through their literature, reflect a discourse that is often polemical, a discourse that also houses marginalizing and legitimating motives.
“Dit is dan ook in hierdie artikel die uitgangspunt dat die noordelike koninkryk van Israel en die suidelike koninkryk van Juda deur hulle literatuur”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
“Josef met hierdie kleed na sy broers in Dotan gestuur word op "n inspeksietog (Gen 38:14)”
§ Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: 'n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief 1 > 5.1.2 Teksinterne oorweginge
“Die kleedmotief en allegoriese droom in Gen 37 staan in noue relasie tot mekaar.”
Citations
Cites
Kreizman, E., & Alter, R. (1982) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905994 · Cited by 811
Alter, R. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 563
Gesenius, W., & Kautzsch, E. (2006) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 506
A Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament
Holladay, W. L. (1971) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004664388 · Cited by 283
Reading the fractures of Genesis: historical and literary approaches
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3255 · Cited by 183
What Is Social-Scientific Criticism?
Lane, R., & Elliott, J. H. (1995) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.2307/3712044 · Cited by 170
Reading the Fractures of Genesis: Historical and Literary Approaches
Fretheim, T. E., & Carr, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3266402 · Cited by 48
David's Truth in Israel's Imagination & Memory
Brueggemann, W. A. (1985) · Cited by 19
The stories of the family troubles of Judah and David: a study of their literary links
Ho, C. Y. S. (1999) · Vetus Testamentum · doi:10.1163/156853399323228425 · Cited by 18
Rethinking Genesis: The Sources and Authorship of the First Book of the Pentateuch
Garrett, D. A. (1991) · Cited by 15
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bruegemann, W 1982. Genesis. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press.
- Mathewson, S D 1989. An exegetical study of Gen 38. Bibliotheca Sacra 146(584), 373-392.
- Soggin, J A 1993. Judah and Tamar (Gen 38), in McKay H A & Clines (eds), Of prophets' visions and the wisdom of the sages: Essays in honour of R Norman Whybray on his seventieth birthday, 281-287. Sheffield: JSOT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Judah and Tamar: A missiological study of Genesis 38 in its redemptive-historical context
Wielenga, B. (2024) · In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi · doi:10.4102/ids.v58i1.3130
Metadata
- Authors
- Viljoen, D. A., & Breytenbach, P. P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Venue
- HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
- Publisher
- AOSIS
- Published
- 2002-11-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0259-9422 (ISSN-L)
- 2072-8050
- OpenAlex
- W2050120031
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Keywords
- Genesis 38, Joseph narrative, sociology of literature, biblical narrative structure, Southern perspective, Kingdom of Judah, Kingdom of Israel, polemics, literary riddles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: ’n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4102/hts.v58i4.706
- The paper
- Viljoen, D. A., & Breytenbach, P. P. B. (2002). Genesis 38 binne die Josefverhaal: ’n Literêr-sosiologiese perspektief. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v58i4.706
